Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B-1B Lancer Fleet To the Boneyard?
Defense Tech ^ | 6/24/2010 | Greg Grant

Posted on 06/24/2010 11:51:30 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: backwoods-engineer

No, that’s the B-52 superbomber. I think Brown called the special B-1s “Vampires.”


41 posted on 06/24/2010 5:13:10 PM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

The bone had a longer alert time and wasn’t supersonic at low altitudes. The conversion to the B-1B eliminated the variable inlets that gave it that speed. Meanwhile, the GLCMs were ready to go and could be posted much closer to their targets.


42 posted on 06/24/2010 5:30:21 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ClayinVA

I agree, but the B-1B sat largely unused for how long?

The GLCM offered a cost/benefit payback that blew the B-1/B-1B away. IIRC, the B-1Bs were removed from the list of nuclear delivery vehicles.


43 posted on 06/24/2010 5:32:22 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

The F-117’s were similar. Panels and exterior components were all drill on assembly. A lot of hydraulic lines were custom fit.

There were so many usable on codes for certain parts that you had to be really paying attention to what part numbers you ordered.

Hand built aircraft.


44 posted on 06/24/2010 5:53:31 PM PDT by SZonian (We began as a REPUBLIC, a nation of laws. We became a DEMOCRACY, majority rules. Next step is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

F-162?


45 posted on 06/24/2010 6:00:30 PM PDT by Boiler Plate ("Why be difficult, when with just a little more work, you can be impossible" Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate

Typing Error


46 posted on 06/24/2010 6:09:41 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ( "Fortes fortuna adiuvat"-Fortune Favors the Strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

As I understand it, the GLCM was threat to get the USSR to sign the SALT treaties. They signed so we didn’t cover Germany and Turkey with the things. I think the Pershing’s scared the hell out of them with the short flight times.


47 posted on 06/24/2010 8:36:20 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2nd Bn, 11th Mar
At some future date, America will rue the day we cut our defense to the bone.

Yes we will. Probably sooner than we think.

48 posted on 06/24/2010 8:43:48 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

You’re probably right.


49 posted on 06/25/2010 4:24:11 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ClayinVA

Pretty much, but it was the INF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) treaty. At the time, I was a Lance missile officer coming into Germany just as the Pershing II was being deployed. The GLCM and the Pershing II were the deal-makers, although other items were added in (launch platform limitations, etc.).

After the treaty was ratified, I remember the large contingent of Soviet officers sent to count every single piece of hardware. The used the verification process to try to gain additional intelligence, but the US never really tried to hide launchers. Everything was parked out in the open.

Both the GLCM and the Pershing II were real threats, so the Soviets took them very seriously. I remember being at Ft. Sill during some of the missile assembly de-mils and destruction. Drunk Soviets all over the place.


50 posted on 06/25/2010 5:07:22 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LS

EB-1C Vampire II
The EB-1C Vampire II is a modification of the B-1 Lancer supersonic strategic bomber used by USAF. It uses many advanced weapons and technology. The bomber carries the AIM-120 air-to-air missile and an anti-ballistic weapon known as the ABM-3 Lancelot which is a plasma yield missiles. It is also capable of transporting, rearming, and refueling small UCAV’s. The airframe is also modified by having no horizontal tail stabilizers and a shortened tail. The EB-1C also uses Mission Adaptive Skin Technology which slightly changes the fibersteel skin of the bomber, greatly enhancing the maneuverability. Utilizing super-cockpit technology ground crew can monitor all aircraft diagnostics and see what the pilots helmets are seeing. The engines are also very advanced, boosting the speed dramatically. This bomber is akin to the proposed B-1R bomber by Boeing.


51 posted on 06/25/2010 5:15:09 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Sometimes you have to go to dark places to get to the light....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer; Tigerized

The BONE is an amazing plane. I have a few shots of the pair of BONEs that did some extremely loud, extremely impressive fly-bys at Oshkosh about ten years ago.


52 posted on 06/25/2010 12:19:57 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. (PursuingLiberty.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson