Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ariz. lawmaker takes aim at automatic citizenship
AP via SacBee ^ | 6/15/10 | MICHELLE PRICE Associated Press Writer

Posted on 06/15/2010 12:53:36 PM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Hodar

The question is over the meaning of the second part and the jurisdiction clause. Even though illegals are on US soil their allegiance and political jurisdiction is still with the home country. The drafters of the Amendment stated that under those circumstances their children are not entitled to automatic citizenship.


41 posted on 06/15/2010 3:41:24 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
This will NOT, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens,

Finish the sentence: "who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States..." If he meant that no children of aliens could be citizens, he wouldn't have added the part about ambassadors. At least that's what the Suprme Court decided in 1896.

42 posted on 06/15/2010 3:45:25 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Glad to see this addressed.


43 posted on 06/15/2010 3:45:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (J. D. Hayworth, the next Senator, the Great State of Arizona - Sen. Poopdeck, Panama is calling...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
This is the clearest statement I have read on the jurisdiction clause and its meaning. It was from Sen. Trumbull and the debates over the 14th Amendment:

The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.

44 posted on 06/15/2010 3:53:37 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat

I was just commenting on the practicality or likelihood of AZ accomplishing this. They talked about a US legal birth certificate certification bill for presidential candidates and then dropped the idea. There is always someone getting our hopes up.


45 posted on 06/15/2010 7:26:16 PM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

Do you have a link?


46 posted on 06/15/2010 8:11:34 PM PDT by Sarabaracuda (McCain, Fiorina, Perry, Branstad, Haley 2010 = Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

“I was just commenting on the practicality or likelihood of AZ accomplishing this. They talked about a US legal birth certificate certification bill for presidential candidates and then dropped the idea. There is always someone getting our hopes up.”

Manual override soon.


47 posted on 06/15/2010 8:14:18 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sarabaracuda
Here you go:

What 'Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof' Really Means

48 posted on 06/15/2010 8:44:17 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

You don’t see how?

READ it!

“...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof...”

“Anchor babies” are citizens because of a statute, not because of the 14th Amendment. Repeal that statute, and they are illegal aliens, like their parents.


49 posted on 06/16/2010 2:11:49 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sarabaracuda

Wasn’t the eligibility for citizenship concerning those born in the U.S. changed to include children of illegal immigrants by the 1965 immigration act?”

If you have such information, post it.


50 posted on 06/16/2010 8:51:59 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Ping


51 posted on 06/16/2010 10:23:14 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImaTexan

PING


52 posted on 06/17/2010 8:40:32 PM PDT by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson