Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

From the article: ...all of the adults are free to date outside the family. "Being bisexual assisted in having a psychological framework for the ability of multiple relationships to make sense," says Maridas...

And here we thought Victorian norms were just...just soo prudish...whereas, here's someone who sounds like they'd sleep with...well, just "anybody" and adopt them into the "marital" free-for-all global partnership!

...others -- such as Surreybased Wiccan priest Sam Wagar, who also filed an affidavit Tuesday -- contend that they have a religious right to practise polygamy, the polyamorists say that for them it's a matter of freedom of expression.

Well, that's what usually happens. It's occultists & cultists like this, and the Oneida community & the Lds in the 19th century and beyond, who try to redefine the family as a "freedom of expression" or freedom of religious expression right.

Better start amending all those "marriage" forms now:
Massachusetts, under Romney, amended theirs to: Partner A and Partner B.
Now, we could have: Partner A
Partner B
Partner C
Partner D
Partner E
Partner F
All the way down to partners X, Y, Z...and I suppose Partner XXX could be the in-house "whore"...as if you might able to distinguish her from the rest of the clan.

1 posted on 06/09/2010 12:09:04 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian; wagglebee
Maridas generally sleeps with Russell, but when "sleep schedules" permit, she and Drew sleep together, often with the baby. "On more rare occasions, Drew, Katy and myself sleep together or Drew, Russell and myself sleep together at night."

Drew and Russell do not have a sexual relationship, which is described as a triad or a "polyamorous V." But all of the adults are free to date outside the family. "Being bisexual assisted in having a psychological framework for the ability of multiple relationships to make sense," says Maridas.

The excesses of the 70s are still with us.

Bill Ayers interview, published in the NY Times on 9-11-2001

“He [Bill Ayers] also writes about the Weathermen’s sexual experimentation as they tried to ‘smash monogamy.’ The Weathermen were ‘an army of lovers,’ he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend.

2 posted on 06/09/2010 12:14:29 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

What scares me is that people with no boundaries like this will be sexually abusing the kids. Like what happened to McKenzie Phillips.


3 posted on 06/09/2010 12:15:45 PM PDT by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

They would the government to accept and celebrate their lifestyle, if they just kept it to themselves who would care?


5 posted on 06/09/2010 12:16:41 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

wait a sec...

are they having sex with the kids too??


6 posted on 06/09/2010 12:17:33 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Send ‘em all to Canada!


7 posted on 06/09/2010 12:17:57 PM PDT by Rio (Don't make me come over there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

I’ve Got Those Folsom Prison Wedding Bell Blues
(hilarious on absurdity of Canadian liberalism!)
THE RANT.US, MAY 30, 2005, JOHN MARTIN, PhD
Excerpt

Muslim leaders have also publicly spoken that once same sex marriage is fully legalized they will demand polygamy also be recognized on religious grounds.

Put the two together and things ought to be interesting. Same-sex polygamy fully legal north of the border. Even in the slammer.

Supposing Bruno; the biggest, toughest, meanest SOB on the tier decides he’s going to marry each and every convict in his cellblock. He could control the drugs, contraband, gambling and all the other prison rackets with immunity. Why? Because no one in Canada can be forced to give evidence against their spouse.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1413989/posts


8 posted on 06/09/2010 12:23:36 PM PDT by donna (Sarah Palin: " ...all of us, who consider ourselves progressive...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

The snowball has started rolling. I want to marry myself!


12 posted on 06/09/2010 12:36:54 PM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

We have the worst unemployment since 1969. I think its gonna be another summer of free love! LOL!


13 posted on 06/09/2010 12:42:08 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Bunch of sickos. They should all be spayed/neutered so they cannot reproduce (at least, not any more).


15 posted on 06/09/2010 1:11:03 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian

Cases like this are the precise reason the State should have nothing to say on the subject of marriage. None whatsoever. Period.


16 posted on 06/09/2010 1:18:27 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson