Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bamahead
My libertarian leanings tell me what ever historic ties marriage may have had with state monarchies , marriage is a religious ritual and there should be no law what so ever about it , any more than laws about baptism .

Since forcible drowning would already be covered , I would say none are warranted there either.

My branch of the libertarian tree also tells me abortion is on the same side of the fence as violence and state governments should answer to their citizens .

Abortion is an issue unlike almost any other in government . It is perhaps the only issue I can think of that rivals slavery and the battle for civil rights as needing separate and unique considerations .

Like slavery and civil rights , there is no gray area in my humble , yet unerringly correct opinion .

10 posted on 06/08/2010 6:49:24 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: kbennkc; bamahead

The problem with looking at marriage as strictly a religious covenant is that so much of society’s foundation is based on marriage and a traditional family structure. What about the children? And property and inheritance? I tend to hold libertarain views on most things, but I don’t think society can toss marriage and the family structure out the window without doing real harm to children and civilization itself.


18 posted on 06/09/2010 7:27:11 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson