Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kbennkc; bamahead

The problem with looking at marriage as strictly a religious covenant is that so much of society’s foundation is based on marriage and a traditional family structure. What about the children? And property and inheritance? I tend to hold libertarain views on most things, but I don’t think society can toss marriage and the family structure out the window without doing real harm to children and civilization itself.


18 posted on 06/09/2010 7:27:11 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Pining_4_TX

A civil contract that can be broken without penalty has not , does not , and will not keep people together against their will . I would be surprised if religious weddings bonds were any tighter . Property can pass by joint tenancy or other title operations , testamentary will , trust device ,or intestate succession law . If society is depending on the government to force people to stay together or make it painful to separate , it is already over .


20 posted on 06/09/2010 9:12:39 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson