Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some US troops in Afghanistan patrol with unloaded weapons
The US Report ^ | 19 May 2010 | Chris Carter

Posted on 05/19/2010 1:53:30 PM PDT by Crush

Commanders have reportedly ordered a U.S. military unit in Afghanistan to patrol with unloaded weapons.

Some soldiers are being ordered to conduct patrols without a round chambered in their weapons, The US Report has learned from an anonymous source at a forward operating base in Afghanistan. Our source was unsure if the order came from his unit or if it affected other units.

On war correspondent Michael Yon's Facebook page, commenters stated that this is a common practice in Iraq, while others said that it is occurring in Afghanistan as well. According to military protocol, “Amber” status requires weapons to have a loaded magazine, but the safety on and no round chambered.

"The idea that any combat unit would conduct any operation, including patrolling and even manning a security post -- in which direct action may-or-may not take place -- and not having weapons loaded, borders on being criminally negligent in my opinion," says Lt. Col. W. Thomas Smith Jr., a recognized expert on terrorism and military/national defense issues. "This is nothing more than infusing politically correct restrictions into already overly restrictive rules of engagement. And this PC nonsense is going to get people killed."

According to Smith, "American soldiers are highly skilled in the use of 'loaded' weapons, and so should be trusted to operate with 'loaded' weapons. If someone overseeing decisions on ROE thinks not, then ratchet up training. But don't put a man on the street and force him to go through multiple prompts when a gunfight breaks out. Remember, the situation can go from quiet to kinetic in half the time it takes to breathe."

In an ambush situation, just how long does it take to engage a target when your weapon isn't already loaded?

(Excerpt) Read more at theusreport.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bhoafghanistan; obama; roe; treason; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
For more on the military's ROE in Afghanistan, visit http://victoryinstitute.net/tag/rules-of-engagement/
1 posted on 05/19/2010 1:53:31 PM PDT by Crush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crush

registered Democrats are happy. They love dead US military personel.


2 posted on 05/19/2010 1:54:59 PM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

The sentries on the USS Cole were under the same ROE.


3 posted on 05/19/2010 1:55:30 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

Sounds like Viet Nam all over again!


4 posted on 05/19/2010 1:56:26 PM PDT by Big_Harry ( Starve the Beast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

I call BS


5 posted on 05/19/2010 1:58:26 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

WHAT?


6 posted on 05/19/2010 1:58:38 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big_Harry

I can almost guarantee they have their weapons locked and loaded.


7 posted on 05/19/2010 1:58:52 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Crush

No effin way.


8 posted on 05/19/2010 1:59:08 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

Idiotic. I don’t go out of the house without one in the chamber.


9 posted on 05/19/2010 2:00:49 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Need work. MBA, CPA, Black Belt. Diverse industry and cross border experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I call BS

Same here. This may as well be written on a men's room stall.

10 posted on 05/19/2010 2:02:25 PM PDT by Hillbillary (I know how to deal with Communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crush
Why don't we take all their weapons away and give them spit wad shooters and maybe rubber band guns if they can pass an extensive background check, drug test, IQ test, competency test and meet the minimum requirements to get on a ride at Disney?
11 posted on 05/19/2010 2:02:26 PM PDT by 23 Everest (Why is the 0bama regime afraid to be proud of and protect our country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

Pure insanity!!! George Bush is a murderer for ordering troops to battle? This a@# clown willfully condones the death of US troops. F’em, F!*K all those at the Whitehouse, and the Pentagon that willfully conduct themselves in this manner.


12 posted on 05/19/2010 2:02:29 PM PDT by 724th (The question is not how far, but rather, do you possess the constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 23 Everest

That was sarcasm folks!


13 posted on 05/19/2010 2:03:31 PM PDT by 23 Everest (Why is the 0bama regime afraid to be proud of and protect our country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I call BS


Me, too. The troops won’t put up with this BS and neither would their field commanders.


14 posted on 05/19/2010 2:03:47 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crush

This just makes the courageous restraint award that much easier to obtain.


15 posted on 05/19/2010 2:04:51 PM PDT by camerongood210
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

My MP nephew in the NG told me that they carry the M9’s without a round in the chamber even though the first shot is a double action pull length.


16 posted on 05/19/2010 2:05:03 PM PDT by headstamp 2 ("No Good Deed Goes Unpunished")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

With the current ROE I’d think they’d have plenty of time to lock and load before firing back.


17 posted on 05/19/2010 2:09:07 PM PDT by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I do not know if the story is accurate but I do know from persoanl experience we were not allowed to keep a round in the chamber in Viet Nam.

As I mentioned on another thread, some regulations are stupid. I figured I would rather be punished for having a round in the chamber while on patrol then be dead. I always kept a round in the chamber.


18 posted on 05/19/2010 2:09:49 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crush

If this is true, which I kind of doubt, I guarantee that it’s an order that is given with a wink-wink-nod-nod in the field.


19 posted on 05/19/2010 2:09:57 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crush

The RoE’s are worse and worse


20 posted on 05/19/2010 2:10:33 PM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson