Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force: Tests didn't include troubled GPS unit
AP via Google News ^ | 5/17/2010 | AP via Google News

Posted on 05/18/2010 8:54:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

military did no advance testing on a specific type of military GPS receiver that had problems picking up locator signals after a change in ground-control software, the Air Force said Monday.

The Air Force tested other equipment, but none of it contained the type of receiver that was unable to lock on to Global Positioning System satellites after the change, said Joe Davidson, a spokesman for the Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center.

The manufacturer of the receivers, Trimble Advanced and Military Systems, said it ran its own advance tests using specifications from the Air Force GPS Wing and found no problems.

"Once the upgrade (on the ground-control software) went live, the compatibility problems were immediately identified and Trimble worked with the GPS Wing to resolve them," Trimble spokeswoman Lea Ann McNabb said in an e-mail.

Davidson said earlier that the problem, which occurred in January, was identified in less than two weeks. A temporary fix was installed in all the receivers and a permanent fix is being distributed, he said.

Davidson said the Air Force's testers didn't have any copies of the affected receiver before the problem. The Air Force is now acquiring a more representative sample of the tens of thousands of GPS receivers in use, he said.

Officials would not say how many weapons or other systems were affected by the problem, but they said operations were halted in only one program as a precaution.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afspc; gps; militarytechnology; miltech; petersonafb; satellite; space; spacesystems; trimble; usaf

1 posted on 05/18/2010 8:54:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

This explains my wrong turn at Albuquerque.....


2 posted on 05/18/2010 8:59:48 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

How vulnurable are all these systems, including the aircraft, to EMP?


3 posted on 05/18/2010 9:02:07 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

AIr Force aircraft(such as the air launch control center) are hardened against EMP.The military GPS satellites are at high altitude are not as vulnerable.


4 posted on 05/18/2010 9:11:10 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("You hit somebody with your fist and not with your fingers spread:-General Heinz Guderian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
So our fighters, AWACS, etc. are safe?

I guess it wouldn't matter though. An EMP attack would devastate us.

5 posted on 05/18/2010 9:14:39 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
That darn Skynet can be such a pain.
6 posted on 05/18/2010 9:18:49 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Obama, proving Hillary right that it takes a Village Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

AWACS definitely. I do not know the about the fighters. There are ways to protect yourself from an EMP attack. Maybe building a Faraday cage.Actually, electronic components already enjoy some form of shielding against electromagnetic interference. Federal Communications Commission standards require it.Upgrading to shield against an EMP would entail using more robust shielding materials, especially for the cords, cables, and/or wires that connect devices to external entities such as power supplies or networks. Cables and wires act as antennas through which an EMP travels directly into a device


7 posted on 05/18/2010 9:23:25 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("You hit somebody with your fist and not with your fingers spread:-General Heinz Guderian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Even if one survived, it would not be fun.

I guess people could wait for all the other benevolant countries of the world to come to our rescue./s


8 posted on 05/18/2010 9:35:06 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove; unkus

Shielding is built in to fighters to prevent EMP damage.


9 posted on 05/18/2010 9:37:19 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Other nations would be facing starvation and disease


10 posted on 05/18/2010 9:37:50 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("You hit somebody with your fist and not with your fingers spread:-General Heinz Guderian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I thought so, Thanks


11 posted on 05/18/2010 9:38:13 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("You hit somebody with your fist and not with your fingers spread:-General Heinz Guderian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I thought an EMP over the continental United States would only affect us, Canada and Mexico.


12 posted on 05/18/2010 10:08:00 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Yes


13 posted on 05/18/2010 10:58:57 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("You hit somebody with your fist and not with your fingers spread:-General Heinz Guderian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson