Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peterson: Congress should 'look at' banning caloric pop from food stamp purchases
www.minnpost.com ^ | 05/14/10 | Derek Wallbank

Posted on 05/14/2010 5:55:37 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3

WASHINGTON — Rep. Collin Peterson on Thursday suggested Congress consider banning caloric soft drinks from being purchased with food stamps as a way to address obesity.

According to multiple reports, Peterson said the proposed ban is "clearly is something we need to look at," though he added that he neither supports nor opposes the suggestion at this point.

Peterson's comments followed a House Agriculture Committee meeting, in which a panelist suggested the embargo. The hearing was one of many Peterson is holding as an early preview of the 2012 Farm Bill, which includes the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

The exact suggestion Peterson was responding to, as reported by Reuters' Charles Abbott:

Wellesley College professor and food expert Rob Paarlberg suggested the ban during a hearing to review the 2008 farm law, which includes food stamps as well as crop subsidies. Food stamps help low-income people buy food. One in eight Americans receives food stamps.

The anti-hunger program accounts for 40 percent of Agriculture Department spending and outweighs crop subsidy and land stewardship spending of $10 billion this year.

"I would argue caloric soda should be made ineligible for purchase under SNAP, like tobacco and alcohol," said Paarlberg, using the new name for food stamps, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. He later said sugary sodas are "a huge part of the obesity problem."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: foodstamps; obesity; peterson; pop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2010 5:55:37 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Now that is an idea worth considering. I often see food stamps buying more soda than I can afford.


2 posted on 05/14/2010 5:56:53 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (Elect Chuck Purgason, US Senate, Missouri! http://www.purgasonforsenate.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

HA! Like to see ‘em try! This Congress appears to fear the people in no way (except of course an angry mob of Pepsi or Mountain Dew-deprived welfare recipients rioting in the streets!)


3 posted on 05/14/2010 5:57:35 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Should just go back to “free food” handouts. Direct distribution of foodstuffs. Worked great for us when my father lost his job back in the early ‘60s.


4 posted on 05/14/2010 5:57:37 AM PDT by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

not to mention...what about our vaunted Ethanol Lobby of Corn Farmers and Grain Belt Congresscritters? You start shutting down demand for HFCS and there is gonna be HELL to PAY!


5 posted on 05/14/2010 5:58:53 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Is that on Michelle Obummers list for Obesity! It should be. Soda is nothing but wasted calories and should be banned from food stamp as should twinkies.


6 posted on 05/14/2010 5:59:24 AM PDT by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

I assumed it already wasn’t allowed. Does this mean that food stamps can be used to purchase chips, ice cream and candy, too? Good grief.


7 posted on 05/14/2010 5:59:47 AM PDT by Spudx7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Where will it stop? No cereal? No boxed or canned foods? Fresh fruit, veggies and bagged beans only?

Food police


8 posted on 05/14/2010 6:00:35 AM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spudx7

Yup. They are considered food items.


9 posted on 05/14/2010 6:02:24 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Well if that’s a good idea, here’s a better one:

1 fresh and dried fruit, and nuts

2 fresh veggies

3 unprocessed, packaged fresh or frozen meats

4 loaves of fresh bread

Nothing else.


10 posted on 05/14/2010 6:03:03 AM PDT by dasboot (Down: up. Up: down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

If you are on welfare getting food stamps then tough titty said the kitty. Get a frigging job, then you can purchase whatever you want.


11 posted on 05/14/2010 6:03:21 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; Little Bill
Meanwhile, steak and lobster are perfectly fine. I see shopping carts full of that stuff and the like on the first weekend of the month, paid for with EBT cards, pushed out to near-new "dualie" trucks, then hear the same people bitch about how they're not making it because they're not given "enough."

Whatever happened to the old expression, "Whoever shall not work, neither shall he eat?"
12 posted on 05/14/2010 6:03:56 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spudx7

You have to have worked in a grocery store at some point to believe it. You can generally spot a Food Stamp recipient even before they open their purse, because the cart is overflowing with pop, Twinkies, Ding-Dongs, Ho-Ho’s, potato chips, etc. That and every cut of meat which people who actually work for a living can’t afford. Not a tomato or a head of lettuce to be found anywhere. If you manage a store one of your challenges is to get your cashiers to stop making snyde remarks in front of such (and I use this term loosely....) customers.

That being said, I am not in favor of a Federal Food Police.


13 posted on 05/14/2010 6:04:05 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

That’s the insidious nature of having someone else in charge of paying for your “needs”...

not only do THEY get to control what you can have,
it makes people like you and me tend to justify that control
because we don’t approve of what it’s being spent on.

Same with healthcare control.


14 posted on 05/14/2010 6:05:26 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
No mention of banning 'soda' only 'caloric' soda - as if sugar is worse than artificial sweeteners.

NO. ..just get the Gov out of the 'food line'. These kind of 'good intentions' lead to hell. We know that.

15 posted on 05/14/2010 6:05:37 AM PDT by cricket (We ARE the Truman Show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I actually have no problem with gov’t restrictions on things when the money is coming from the public coffers. If people are going to insist on having other people support them, they should accept whatever guidelines are imposed upon them. Might make welfare and other gov’t programs less attractive.

And no, I don’t condemn anyone who has to accept public aid on a temporary basis, to get them through a rough patch. But if you make it too easy and comfortable, it becomes a lifestyle.


16 posted on 05/14/2010 6:06:05 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Forcing one person to pay for the irresponsibility of another is NOT social justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Spudx7

yes


17 posted on 05/14/2010 6:06:05 AM PDT by GeronL (Political Correctness Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3
They'll just trade them...there's no point to it.

And guess what...milk has calories, too.

18 posted on 05/14/2010 6:06:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

I’d like to see soda banned from food stamps but for a completely different reason. Take away soda, sweets, salt, potato chip type snacks etc. Piss these leaches off and see if any decide to work for a paycheck!


19 posted on 05/14/2010 6:06:31 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
"Whoever shall not work, neither shall he eat?"

2 Thess 3:10.

A Christian precept, and therefore, to be rejected in "post-Christian" America.

20 posted on 05/14/2010 6:06:42 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson