Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the Convention on the Rights of the Child Will Destroy Family Sanctity
Family Security Matters ^ | May 2, 2010 | Adam Raezler

Posted on 05/03/2010 3:49:23 AM PDT by captjanaway

The Convention on the Rights of the Child, an international treaty commonly referred to as CRC, is one of the greatest threats to parental rights our country has ever witnessed. Fasten your seatbelts for the fight for ratification. The CRC’s devastating impact on American children and their families can be seen easily in the text of the treaty and its application in both foreign states and in recent U.S. court decisions. Do not be misled by the arguments of American legislators, legal scholars and transnationalists who say U.S. ratification of the CRC would prove our commitment to the protection of the world’s children and their rights to the international community. The CRC is in no way a harmless treaty; it is an instrument used by transnationalists for widespread social change, beginning right here in our own country. Similar to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) treaty, U.S. ratification will in no way provide the children of the world with any additional forms of protections they don’t already enjoy under United States law, just as CEDAW affords women no rights beyond what they currently enjoy under U.S. law.

(Excerpt) Read more at familysecuritymatters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arth; crc; family; lping; obama; sovereignty; treaty; un; unicef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 05/03/2010 3:49:24 AM PDT by captjanaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

Homeschooling is one of the primary targets of this treaty.


2 posted on 05/03/2010 4:07:40 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

We are approaching the worst period in the entire history of mankind. It can’t be stopped, avoided, or escaped. All children will be born into a hell with no chance of respite.

Do one of two things:
1. Never let your kids out of your sight so that the blue helmets can’t steal them, brainwash them, corrupt them, and milk them like a resource.

2. Don’t ever start a family.


3 posted on 05/03/2010 4:17:30 AM PDT by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; HonestConservative; holdonnow

ping


4 posted on 05/03/2010 4:37:35 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray, Pray, Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

When my child was being raised I gave him all rights that a child could have. He had the absolutely FREE right to do anything I told him to do! He had the right to experience a “whuppin” for violating that right.

The most remarkable thing was that he grew up into a healthy, normal, and most importantly...masculine male.

As a child I was beaten severely but I never transposed that to my son. All punishment was measured and weighted by the offense committed.


5 posted on 05/03/2010 4:37:46 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
Metmom,

This treaty threatens homeschooling, and is likely of interest to those on the "Another Reason to Homeschool" ping list.

Committee on the Rights of the Child has taken it upon themselves to issue rulings, based on their interpretation of the CRC, on a wide array of issues and topics including - but not limited to - sex education, home schooling, children’s right to privacy from their parents, abortion and parental consent laws, access to contraceptives and contraceptive medication, religious teaching, day care vs. parents raising children at home and the death penalty for juveniles.

The report claimed that government officials should have the right to interview homeschooled children without a parent present and that the government should have a larger role in the curriculum selection for homeschooled children.In February 2008, a California court declared that “parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,” unless they are certified by the state to teach.

This ruling used the CRC as a guiding principle and failed to take into account established U.S. court precedent. The California decision ignored the 1972 Supreme Court decision in Wisconsin v Yoder and its 2000 ruling in Troxel v Granville, which guaranteed parents the fundamental right to direct the upbringing and education of their children. The danger that American homeschooling families face from the CRC principles will become the supreme law of the land, as stipulated in Article VI of the Constitution, if the Senate should ratify it.

6 posted on 05/03/2010 4:44:13 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway
...Clinton signed the CRC in 1995 but never submitted it to the Senate for advice and consent, as he knew the treaty would be dead on arrival.

President George W. Bush chose not to push for Senate ratification, as he fully recognized the threat that the CRC presented to American sovereignty.

However there has been a surge in the push for the United States to ratify the CRC since Obama took office.

BUSH!!! If only he had pushed it through his rubber stamp, far right-wing CONgre$$ we wouldn't be seeing this play out today.

7 posted on 05/03/2010 4:45:34 AM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Homeschooling is one of the primary targets of this treaty.

You got that right!

Ratification of this treaty would further weaken American sovereignty, however, as the CRC treaty would become the supreme law of the land under Article VI of our Constitution.

This foreign treaty is the only tool available to them to force the United States to accept their deepest legislative desires. These desires include ...

...the dismantling of our current homeschooling system in the United States;

8 posted on 05/03/2010 4:58:27 AM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: metmom

ping to post 2 & 6


9 posted on 05/03/2010 5:24:03 AM PDT by uptoolate ("Unemployed? Depressed? Angry? Don't Beat Your Wife... Beat A Democrat..." VOTE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

UNICEF insists the CRC is not a mere statement of altruism. It is a “legally binding instrument” of “non-negotiable standards and obligations,” which would trump existing American laws that conflict with it.

The Committee on the Rights of the Child is completely aware of Article VI of the United States Constitution and that the CRC will become the supreme law of the land if ratified.

Click the link and read the entire article. This thing is terrifying, especially in light of the "goals" that are now well known.


11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

10 posted on 05/03/2010 5:32:34 AM PDT by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

It’s already been distroyed through government welfare programs, DV laws and family court.


11 posted on 05/03/2010 5:49:05 AM PDT by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

The homeschooling chickens are coming home to roost.

THIS is why it is important to fight liberalism in the public schools. When you abandon the schools to the “progressives,” you allow them to indoctrinate future voters unopposed.

Now there’s a UN resolution coming down the pike that will be passed by the representatives the public school students have elected.

And you have no one to blame but YOURSELVES, because you abandoned the fight and cowered in your homes, all the while lambasting the rest of us who had the courage to fight.

You’re getting what you deserve. Thanks for nothing.


12 posted on 05/03/2010 6:33:27 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime; uptoolate

I’ll ping both lists.


13 posted on 05/03/2010 9:14:10 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; adopt4Christ; Aggie Mama; agrace; AliVeritas; ...

This ping list is for articles of interest to homeschoolers. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping List. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added or removed from either list, or both.

The keyword for the FREE REPUBLIC HOMESCHOOLERS’ FORUM is frhf.


14 posted on 05/03/2010 9:19:49 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah; bamahead; 2Jedismom; 6amgelsmama; AAABEST; aberaussie; Aggie Mama; ...

Ping


15 posted on 05/03/2010 9:21:20 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captjanaway

Next step in the attempted murder of the family.


16 posted on 05/03/2010 9:24:14 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer

Or have as many kids as we can, raise them right, teach them to shoot straight and vote/run/participate in the political process and take our country back by demographics.

Sorry, FRiend, but a strong offense suits Americans better than turtling up like a European.


17 posted on 05/03/2010 9:26:06 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
HARRUMPH! HARRUMPH!


18 posted on 05/03/2010 9:31:06 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Look to the Cosmic Battle.
Soothesayer doesn’t believe in it, ironically.

The family is the main vehicle of perpetuating the knowledge of God, and it is no wonder that Satan and his earthly minions have it as their primary target.


19 posted on 05/03/2010 9:32:36 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I am just happy to be on the victorious side. ;-]


20 posted on 05/03/2010 9:47:06 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson