Skip to comments.
Gates Says U.S. Lacks Strategy to Curb Iran’s Nuclear Drive
New York Times ^
Posted on 04/17/2010 5:33:08 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Sub-Driver
And yet, Obama has a clear cut strategy regarding Israeli settlements.
Does this mean that Israeli settlements are more of a strategic threat to humanity than Iranian nuclear bombs?
41
posted on
04/17/2010 6:14:18 PM PDT
by
FLCowboy,
(And people thought Jimmy Carter was our worst president........)
To: Sub-Driver
Has there ever been someone that has never had a real job be elected as POTUS?
Seriously, this a$$ may have sold grass but he sure as hell never cut grass.
I doubt whether he has ever earned a single dollar through honest work.
42
posted on
04/17/2010 6:15:04 PM PDT
by
Eagles6
( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
To: Sub-Driver
"
Gates Says U.S. Lacks Strategy Leadership to Curb Irans Nuclear Drive"
There... thats better.
43
posted on
04/17/2010 6:31:02 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: Sub-Driver
“Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has warned in a secret three-page memorandum to top White House officials that the United States does not have an effective long-range policy for dealing with Irans steady progress toward nuclear capability, according to government officials familiar with the document.”
Something about the New York Times, and the words “Secret Document”, or “Secret memorandum” that just don’t go well together.
Seems the NYT thinks those words mean it is something they absolutely have to publish, or suffer some sort of penalty if they don’t.
44
posted on
04/17/2010 6:39:51 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
To: savedbygrace
Odumbos strategy is to have a nuclear Iran
45
posted on
04/17/2010 6:41:15 PM PDT
by
italianquaker
(My bartender knew about the attempted Christmas attack before odumbo)
To: Gay State Conservative
Not to worry,you worthless Hussein stooge...Israel's got a planTook the words right off my keyboard.
46
posted on
04/17/2010 6:43:03 PM PDT
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: Sub-Driver
Gates is a moronic idiot. This SFB can't explain away that there is no political will to do what needs to be done, no moral clarity to stand for what is right.
Gates has turned into/remains a conflicted REMF who has the ideology of a turd.
47
posted on
04/17/2010 6:49:22 PM PDT
by
SERE_DOC
(My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons! How does one clean a phase 4 plasma rifle)
To: MississippiMan; savedbygrace; elizabethgrace
“I suspect the lack of strategy rests 100% at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, not the Pentagon. I further suspect it's not even a priority at the White House.”
Right on both accounts. The Goldwater-Nichols act requires the CIC to present a National Security Strategy to the congress 180 days after being inaugurated.
That was July/August 2009.
National Security is not a priority for Obama.
Check keyword search ‘nationalsecurityfail’, ‘NSS’, and ‘NSP’ for further articles dealing with the current CIC and the National Security Strategy of the US.
To: savedbygrace
Are you suggesting Gates would only develop these strategies if Obama gave him a direct order to do it? Gates would be a fool if he waited for orders. Its his job to be prepared. I'm suggesting Gates and the Pentagon indeed have military strategies that are being ignored by the White House.
MM (in TX)
49
posted on
04/17/2010 7:01:50 PM PDT
by
MississippiMan
(http://gogmagogblog.wordpress.com/)
To: Jet Jaguar
National Security is not a priority for Obama. Thou speakest much truth.
MM (in TX)
50
posted on
04/17/2010 7:13:55 PM PDT
by
MississippiMan
(http://gogmagogblog.wordpress.com/)
To: MississippiMan
That makes more sense than the way you put it before.
51
posted on
04/17/2010 7:20:01 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
To: savedbygrace
52
posted on
04/17/2010 7:28:55 PM PDT
by
MississippiMan
(http://gogmagogblog.wordpress.com/)
To: Sub-Driver
Obama has an Iran strategy? Sure he does...
53
posted on
04/17/2010 7:43:35 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Sub-Driver
If Obama were a world leader rather than a “rock star” he would have gone offensive following Iran's fraudulent elections and mass uprisings last summer. Obama could have declared Ahmadinejad’s election illegitimate then united a coalition of Europeans countries to join the U.S. in refusing to recognize the Iranian regime. The opposition was waiting for this type of signal but it never came.
54
posted on
04/17/2010 8:22:26 PM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: Sub-Driver
“national security adviser, Gen. James L. Jones”
So, this General watches Hulu all day then? He hasn’t presented and achieved agreement on policy? How are MOUs, Directives, COOP and Instructions handed down to the field exactly without policy justification?
55
posted on
04/17/2010 8:48:56 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
To: Sub-Driver
Duh. Apparently, the only people who don't know this yet are the fascists, I mean democrats.
56
posted on
04/17/2010 8:51:46 PM PDT
by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: Sub-Driver; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...
57
posted on
04/17/2010 9:47:18 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Sub-Driver
“the United States does not have an effective long-range policy for dealing with Iran”
The United States does not currently have an effective policy for dealing with ANYTHING. Iran is just one small example.
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Oh they have them alright....they use them against us.
59
posted on
04/18/2010 12:47:25 AM PDT
by
caww
To: Jet Jaguar; MississippiMan; elizabethgrace
The problem with any theories about this, including yours, is that we don’t know the facts for certain.
First, the story comes from the Slimes. As someone posted above, this is an intentional leak from Obama.
So, it could be a ham-fisted attempt at disinformation by the Boy King.
Second, if Gates has developed strategies for these scenarios, and I believe he has, why didn’t he mention them at the meeting? It’s a nonsensical account of things, IMO.
60
posted on
04/18/2010 6:14:23 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(You are only leading if people follow. Otherwise, you just wandered off.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson