To: Cheap_Hessian
Gillibrand is becoming an empty suit.
2 posted on
04/13/2010 2:19:57 PM PDT by
Tarpon
( ...Rude crude socialist Obama depends on ignorance to force his will on people)
To: Cheap_Hessian
Why don’t we have a viable candidate running against her???
3 posted on
04/13/2010 2:21:38 PM PDT by
parisa
To: Cheap_Hessian
I just said on a thread earlier today that a nobody GOPer could beat Gillibrand — and presto, here’s a poll that shows it’s within striking range.
To: Cheap_Hessian
She's a hottie...but still a RAT!
I see we have Bruce Blakeman, Joe DioGuardi, and David Malpass. All are accomplished people with political experience. I don't how they'd vote, but I doubt they are conservatives. I don't expect too much from New York other than left and far left.
To: Cheap_Hessian
Not necessarily as good as it sounds. It’s almost always easier to get higher ratings for “no named opponent,” but often when you plug in names, the number falls. Not saying she’s safe, but I wouldn’t get too excited.
11 posted on
04/13/2010 2:44:08 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: Cheap_Hessian
![](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_rIStsf6uzLk/SZumR9vE1XI/AAAAAAAABFY/nnixpfNPS2k/s400/DAmato1.jpg)
Where is Al?
16 posted on
04/13/2010 3:27:15 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
(Some want to enslave your body others your soul.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson