Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zero Has No Legs
GlobalSecurity.org ^ | April 5, 2010 | Amitai Etzioni

Posted on 04/05/2010 10:14:43 PM PDT by myknowledge

President Obama's strategy to protect us from the danger of nuclear war and nuclear terrorism is about to be tested. The precept that good deeds (and fabulous speeches) beget good deeds will face reality at two major international conferences: Obama's Nuclear Security Summit in mid April and the Review Conference of the Parties to the Non-Proliferation Treaty in May.

Obama proffered an attractive vision of a world without nuclear weapons, and a theory--that if Russia and the U.S. reduce their stockpiles, other nations will be inspired either to give up their nuclear arms or refrain from acquiring them. That is the best kind of leadership--setting a good example, serving as a role model, changing the atmosphere.

  1. Will North Korea now agree to scale back its military nuclear program?

  2. Will Iran agree to live up to its international obligations and allow proper IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities?

  3. Will Pakistan and India scale back their military nuclear programs?

  4. Will terrorists have less access to the roughly 10,000 tactical (small) nuclear bombs Russia has, which are not covered by the new treaty?

  5. Will the NPT be revised, especially to close the clause that allows nations to quit the treaty--and take with them their dual-use faculties--and legally make bombs?

I predict (and it takes very little foresight to make this prediction) that the American and Russian moves toward zero will have no discernable effect on any of these burning issues. The President will have to employ other means to foster the nations involved to make progress in the required directions.

I am not against inspiring the people of the world and their leaders. However, it seems quite evident that the U.S., its allies, and other responsible powers must add strong incentives for nations to deproliferate and strong disincentives for those who do not. Much stronger sanctions, fuller enforcement of the ban against shipping nuclear material from one nation to another, diplomatic pressure on India and Pakistan to settle their differences (rather than providing either with nuclear assets and know-how), and at least leaving military options on the table are all called for.

Nuclear arms are the greatest threat to our security, that of our allies, and to world peace. It is time to treat them accordingly.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appeasement; nuclearsuicide; nuclearwar; nukes; obama
Revelation 6:4 And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.

Revelation 6:8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

A nuclear WWIII is in the works, followed by the deathblow to America as prophesied in Revelation 18.

1 posted on 04/05/2010 10:14:43 PM PDT by myknowledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
"(and fabulous speeches)"

What? Who? Who's making "fabulous speeches"?

2 posted on 04/05/2010 10:24:06 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Socialism is for people who've given up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

O’s Fantasy of No Nukes would be a world of massive conventional armed conflict.

Wars far beyond the scale of WWII. Death and Destruction of the innocent on such a scale as the blood would stain the earth to the mantle.

The Nuke has brought peace to the world.

When will this guy figure out, peace is peace. Negotiation of the nukes doesn’t bring more peace, it either it is or it isn’t.

Lack of Nukes means war.


3 posted on 04/05/2010 10:39:01 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Fatuous speeches?


4 posted on 04/05/2010 10:40:17 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

A nuclear WWIII is in the works, followed by the deathblow to America as prophesied in Revelation 18.


I didn’t think America itself is identified in end times prophesy. However, I beleive our country is going to be either destroyed or very badly hurt by foreign powere. We are now being hit from within and soon from without.


5 posted on 04/05/2010 10:43:55 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Yes, you understand that in the end, all Countries will turn against Israel - happening as we watch. Wondered why we were not mentioned in the Bible myself, maybe it is because in the end times, we are insignificant. Seems that it is the way we are going...


6 posted on 04/05/2010 11:39:52 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

This is not a rational response to Israel, but a rage response. For them daring to sit there while Slammies keep losing their head. The devil is behind it.


7 posted on 04/05/2010 11:48:16 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Silly, I support Israel to the hilt! I’m just quoting the Bible to you - did you read it?


8 posted on 04/05/2010 11:56:51 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

Mr. Communitarian has spoken.


9 posted on 04/06/2010 3:59:28 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813
WOW! I really think this idiot is on crack. Amen.
10 posted on 04/06/2010 5:06:58 AM PDT by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gakrak

He’s what he is ... but half the people who voted for him were on crack!


11 posted on 04/06/2010 5:20:37 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (http://www.thepatriotsflag.com - The Patriot's Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

Russia will NOT cut their nukes. We will be shown old 1970’s nukes IF we verify (which we won’t). Russia, err the “Former” USSR, meanwhile, continues to build nukes and upgrade their ABM systems.


12 posted on 04/08/2010 6:23:09 AM PDT by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Of course they won’t. It’s all one sided in favor of our Cold War foe.


13 posted on 04/08/2010 7:38:36 AM PDT by myknowledge (B.H. Obama's just a frontman. A frontman for who? The globalist elite, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson