Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration’s 2010 Calling Card Is “Payback”
Townhall.com ^ | April 2, 2010 | Katie Packer

Posted on 04/02/2010 6:38:53 AM PDT by Kaslin

In a year when the anger of the American people toward Washington politicians and their backroom deal-making has hit a fever pitch, President Obama surprised many with an overtly political and gratuitous reward to union bosses by not only heeding their demands to recess appoint both of their nominees to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), but also leaving another out altogether.

Obama’s actions smack of “payback” to labor bosses who invested half a billion dollars getting him elected in the first place. Furthermore, the appointments of Craig Becker and Mark Pearce can certainly be read as a slight to the former institution Obama served in, the U.S. Senate.

Craig Becker is considered a labor radical by Republicans and Democrats alike, and members of both parties voted down his nomination. In appointing Becker during the Congressional recess, Obama has chosen in one act to bypass the Congress, ignore the will of the American people, put forward a job-killing agenda and, lastly, reward his friends in Big Labor.

Becker’s nomination has been controversial from the start. Groups representing small businesses and the hardworking employees that keep them running, such as the Workforce Fairness Institute (WFI), have warned Congress about “The Becker Doctrine” of forced unionization, which would result in increased unemployment and decreased freedoms.

All 41 Republican members of the Senate urged Obama not to appoint Becker during the Easter recess, saying in a letter that, “We oppose Mr. Becker’s recess appointment because of his extensive, highly controversial writings, and his entire legal and scholarly career, all of which indicate that he could not be viewed as impartial, unbiased or objective in deciding cases before this quasi-judicial agency. Instead, his writings clearly indicate that he would use his position on the NLRB to institute far-reaching changes in labor law far exceeding the Board’s authority and bypassing the role of Congress. His rejection of traditional notions of democracy in union elections and of an employer’s status as a party to labor representation proceedings has garnered bi-partisan opposition to his nomination.”

Given his past writings and employment by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) and Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Becker could potentially implement pieces of the job-killing Employee ‘Forced’ Choice Act (EFCA) through “administrative action.”

In fact, union bosses expect nothing less. Recently an AFL-CIO member wrote, “If [sic] we aren’t able to pass the Employee Free Choice Act, we will work with President Obama and Vice President Biden and their appointees to the National Labor Relations Board to change the rules governing forming a union through administrative action...”

EFCA would force workers into unions by removing their right to vote via secret ballot during union-organizing elections, opening them up to intimidation and coercion by labor bosses and organizers. EFCA would also force workers and businesses into two-year binding contracts with set wages and benefits determined by a federal government bureaucrat. Worse yet, workers would have zero say in their own contracts. And, the pension programs they would be forced to join are currently, in many cases, financially bankrupt.

EFCA is the number one goal for labor bosses since it will drive up union membership, and more importantly, increase dues. After all, bankrupt union pension plans can only be replenished with more dues -paying members – Big Labor’s dirty little secret.

Becker’s appointment could usher in a whole host of new paybacks to union bosses, which they have been hoping for since supporting Obama’s campaign. But forced unionization rules that take away workers’ rights, or even the rights of small businesses to stay afloat, are not consistent with the concerns of the American people and directly contradict the priorities the administration committed to address, namely jobs.

President Obama’s actions this past weekend of not only appointing an enemy of small business and job creation, but following it by appointing the other nominee supported by Big Labor while ignoring Brian Hayes’ nomination, sends a message to the nation’s job creators that they do not have an ally in the White House, but rather an antagonist committed to following his political patrons down a road that results in lost jobs and a weakened America.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: noaccountability; nojustice; notransparency; obamadictatorship

1 posted on 04/02/2010 6:38:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In keeping with this theme look at any and all comments by so-called supporters of health care reform. They care not a fig about health, care, reform or any other euphemism.

It’s strictly about punishment and politics and GWB is frequently mentioned as if he has/had anything to do with it.


2 posted on 04/02/2010 6:40:41 AM PDT by relictele (Obama: foolish enough to argue with a dictionary and arrogant enought to claim victory.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama is the hired tool of Big Labor.


3 posted on 04/02/2010 6:41:55 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Payback” is a two way street!

And he’s outnumbered!


4 posted on 04/02/2010 6:46:44 AM PDT by G Larry (DNC is comprised of REGRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

I’ve noticed that too. It’s all about politics and paybacks. One classmate of mine was arguing health care from the “Bush started it” standpoint. He didn’t last long in the argument.


5 posted on 04/02/2010 6:49:53 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: relictele

When American society and our economy begins falling apart due to healthcare reform, who do you think will get blamed for it?


6 posted on 04/02/2010 7:56:19 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ignoring the will of the American people is well beyond dangerous.


7 posted on 04/02/2010 8:36:36 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Recently an AFL-CIO member wrote, “If [sic] we aren’t able to pass the Employee Free Choice Act, we will work with President Obama and Vice President Biden and their appointees to the National Labor Relations Board to change the rules governing forming a union through administrative action...”

Chilling


8 posted on 04/02/2010 11:21:09 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

As a life-long bookkeeper, I would advise a client to disolve their business, and reorganize with co-owners who have small holdings of stock and no voting rights for the running of the company......preferred stock would have all the voting rightsm and common would have none.

Some sort of partnership......LLP or whatever. Each partner will be responsible for their own taxes, etc.

Make stockholders recipients of part of the profits via deividends. The tighter ship they run, the better their dividends will be.


9 posted on 04/02/2010 2:35:50 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson