Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 166 (On Motion to Recommit | Stupak Amendment)
House of Representatives Clerk ^ | March 21, 2010

Posted on 03/22/2010 12:12:43 AM PDT by UAConservative

Here is the vote on the motion to recommit on the Stupak language so you can see how your Congressman voted.

Democrats who voted "Aye" are in italics. All of the "No" votes are Democrats.

AYES 199

Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Berry
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boozman
Boren
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bright
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Cao
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Castle
Chaffetz
Chandler
Childers
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Costello
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (KY)
Davis (TN)
Deal (GA)
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Donnelly (IN)
Dreier
Duncan
Ehlers
Emerson
Fallin
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves
Griffith
Guthrie
Hall (TX)
Harper
Hastings (WA)
Heller
Hensarling
Herger
Hoekstra
Holden
Hunter
Inglis
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline (MN)
Lamborn
Lance
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee (NY)
Lewis (CA)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Marshall
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
Melancon
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Olson
Paul
Paulsen
Pence
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Posey
Price (GA)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rehberg
Reichert
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schock
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Souder
Stearns
Sullivan
Taylor
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Turner
Upton
Walden
Wamp
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

Let it be known that these are the real pro-life representatives, who stand up for the rights of an unborn child, even when it isn't the politically showy thing to do!



And now for the "No" votes


NOES 232

Ackerman
Adler (NJ)
Andrews
Arcuri
Baca
Baird
Baldwin
Bean
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boccieri
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Dahlkemper
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Driehaus
Edwards (MD)
Edwards (TX)
Ellison
Ellsworth
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Foster
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Giffords
Gonzalez
Gordon (TN)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Halvorson
Hare
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Herseth Sandlin
Higgins
Hill
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hodes
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E.B.
Kagen
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kilroy
Kind
Kirkpatrick (AZ)
Kissell
Klein (FL)
Kosmas
Kratovil
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Luján
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney
Markey (CO)
Markey (MA)
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McMahon
McNerney
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Minnick
Mitchell
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (NY)
Murphy, Patrick
Nadler (NY)
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Nye
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Perriello
Peters
Pingree (ME)
Polis (CO)
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Rodriguez
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Salazar
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schauer
Schiff
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sestak
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Space
Speier
Spratt
Stark
Stupak
Sutton
Tanner
Teague
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Titus
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (OH)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; democrats; rollcall; socialisthealthcare; stupak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
FOR THE NEXT 7 MONTHS, MAKE SURE YOU LET ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS, FAMILY, AND OTHER ACQUAINTANCES KNOW THE NAMES OF THESE DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED "NO".

MAKE SURE YOU FOCUS ON THE ONES WHO CAMPAIGN ON "PRO-LIFE" STANCES, BECAUSE ON NOVEMBER 2, 2010, "WE THE PEOPLE" WILL EXPOSE THEIR HYPOCRISY!

1 posted on 03/22/2010 12:12:43 AM PDT by UAConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UAConservative

I don’t understand what this vote means?

Is this something to do with what obama offered to get this guy to vote yes?


2 posted on 03/22/2010 12:19:31 AM PDT by plinyelder ("I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative

Also why did Stupak vote no on something with his name on it?

Humor an old man .. please?

(Not real swift with these political doings)


3 posted on 03/22/2010 12:22:25 AM PDT by plinyelder ("I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative

so Stupak sold his soul on his own amendment’s language???

was he always such a fraud or did the Pelosi-crats put a severed horse’s head in his bed?


4 posted on 03/22/2010 12:22:52 AM PDT by Enchante (Obama and Brennan think that 20% of terrorists re-joining the battle is just fine with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Stupak didn’t want to make the 30 pro-death Rats bolt.


5 posted on 03/22/2010 12:25:00 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative
I'm frustrated.

I seem to have a decent democrat representing my district. Lincoln Davis (D-TN) voted yes for the recommit bill, no for healthcare reform, no for cap and trade.

His voting record looks ok. But I don't want to vote for a democrat, because I don't want to risk leaving the democrat party in control.

6 posted on 03/22/2010 12:27:41 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plinyelder
The Republicans offered a motion to recommit on the Stupak language, which would have restated the Hyde Amendment for the reconciliation bill. When I was a parliamentarian for some student organizations in college, it was to, in effect, resurrect a defeated bill/resolution for another vote. The background on the recommit is this:

BO offered to sign an executive order restating Hyde (which means jack crap since EOs don't have the force of law) in order to get Stupak and the rest of his coalition's 11 votes on HCR, which led to the 219-212 passage tonight.

The GOP leadership knew what Stupak and his posse really were...hypocrites, so they pulled this procedural move to get the Stupak 12 to vote against their own bill, which they did.

Stupak is done in the MI-1. He's probably just waiting for a judgeship/ambassadorship after he gets drubbed in November. I think we'll find out what his price was in the near future.

7 posted on 03/22/2010 12:29:15 AM PDT by UAConservative (Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

yes, and apparently they knew HE would not “bolt” ..... interesting to see whose “convictions” and “principles” hold up when so much is on the line ..... so one moral is that there are no “pro-life” Democrats anymore?? only some that pay lip service at campaign time....


8 posted on 03/22/2010 12:32:18 AM PDT by Enchante (Obama and Brennan think that 20% of terrorists re-joining the battle is just fine with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative

These are the true numbers... the rest was just for theater, nothing more.

Stupak didn’t have to spend the past weeks grandstanding about making a deal - he could have stood back and voted for the motion to recommit to put his language back in the bill.


9 posted on 03/22/2010 12:32:55 AM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: plinyelder
The deal with the Stupak reversal is this:

If Stupak's amendment had gone through, the pro-abortion RATs would have abandoned the reconciliation bill, scuttling the plan.

To satisfy the abortion Dems and Stupak, BO offered a compromise to issue an Executive Order stating that no public dollars can be used to fund abortion (the Hyde Amendment). In exchange, Stupak would not bring up abortion funding in reconciliation.

In short, the Republicans called his bluff on his abortion stance.

10 posted on 03/22/2010 12:34:53 AM PDT by UAConservative (Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative

ah, thanks for the info and explanation — seems that the little Stupak group has inadvertently revealed that “pro-life Democrat” is an oxymoron (as had been obvious for so long but still......)


11 posted on 03/22/2010 12:35:42 AM PDT by Enchante (Obama and Brennan think that 20% of terrorists re-joining the battle is just fine with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: plinyelder

Sorry, I seemed to posted the same stuff to you twice. My bad :p


12 posted on 03/22/2010 12:36:29 AM PDT by UAConservative (Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Yes, it would be far better to find a repub to vote for.


13 posted on 03/22/2010 12:36:38 AM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

You might want to reconsider your statement on Davis. In 2008 he had an ACU 12 voting record and a 29 for 2009. That means he votes no on high profile votes with the GOP but on everything else he is a LIBERAL. Been noticing that quite a bit as I check voting records. With so many more Dems then GOP Pelosi is telling people like Davis to go ahead and vote NO but with that voting record he would vote YES if he was needed and I would bet on that one.


14 posted on 03/22/2010 12:38:48 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Rick Perry - TX Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative

Dr. Coburn is waiting to put a hold on any nomination of the RATs that lose in 2010 since it will be obvious they voted YES in exchange for a job after defeat!


15 posted on 03/22/2010 12:41:10 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Rick Perry - TX Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming
"Yes, it would be far better to find a repub to vote for."

True, I'd rather have a Repub that votes the same way. But there is a significant risk that a Repub might not vote as sensibly as he has. And that's the delimina.

I think the democrats need to be sent a message. And unfortunately, that means taking down the good with the bad.

16 posted on 03/22/2010 12:41:19 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative

Heck .. I needed to read it twice anyway! lol
I am Really dense on these issues!

Thank You


17 posted on 03/22/2010 12:45:33 AM PDT by plinyelder ("I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: plinyelder
I don’t understand what this vote means?

Bambi says executive order will guarantee no public funding for abortion. Stupak says, OK I support Obamacare!

Bottom line: the law trumps executive orders and Stupak is both a chump and a baby killer! Nice goin', Bart! We'll remember in November! You are both too stupid and too evil to be in government!

18 posted on 03/22/2010 12:47:59 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

You need to stop buying into the myth of the moderate Democrat. Every House Democrat votes for Nancy Pelosi to be Speaker. No moderate would do such a thing. Pelosi shrewdly allows some Dems from moderate districts to vote against certain bills where she already has enough votes. See through the person who talks moderate at home and votes Socialist in DC.


19 posted on 03/22/2010 1:47:51 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UAConservative
Even after the ineffective value of the EO was clearly understand, Stupak still chose to vote against the unborn.

Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.

20 posted on 03/22/2010 2:05:20 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson