Posted on 03/17/2010 6:25:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
I like my hometown, but I must admit that New York has problems: high taxes, noise, traffic. Forbes magazine just ranked my city the 16th most miserable in America. Ouch! Of course, that makes me wonder: What's America's most miserable city?
Cleveland, says Forbes. People call it "the Mistake by the Lake. " Cleveland, once America's sixth-largest city, has been going downhill for decades.
Why do some cities thrive while others decay? One reason is that some politicians smother their cities with the unintended consequences of their grand visions, while others have the good sense to limit government power.
In a state that already taxes its citizens heavily, Cleveland's politicians drown businesses in taxes.
One result: Since 2000, 50,000 people have left the city. Half of Cleveland's population has left since 1950.
But the politicians haven't learned. They still think government is the key to revitalization. While Indianapolis privatized services, Cleveland prefers state capitalism. It owns and operates a big grocery store, the West Side Market. Typical of government, it's open only four days a week, and two of those days it closes at 4 p.m. The city doesn't maintain the market very well. Despite those cost savings, the city manages to lose money running the market. It also loses money running golf courses -- $400,000 last year.
Another way that cities like Cleveland cause their own decline is through regulations that make building anything a long drawn-out affair. Cleveland has 22 different zoning designations and 673 pages of zoning guidelines.
By contrast, Houston has almost no zoning. This permits a mix of uses and styles that gives the city vitality. And the paperwork in Houston is so light that a business can get going in a single afternoon. In Cleveland, one politician bragged that he helped a business get though the red tape in "just 18 months."
Randall O'Toole, author of "The Best-Laid Plans: How Government Planning Harms Your Quality of Life, Your Pocketbook, and Your Future", says Houston does have rules, but they are more flexible and responsive to citizens' needs because they are set by neighborhood associations based on protective covenants written by developers.
Politicians' rules rarely change because the politicians don't have their own money on the line. Cleveland's managers thought that funding gleaming new sports stadiums (which subsidize wealthy team owners) and other prestigious attractions like the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame would revitalize their city.
Urban policy expert Joel Kotkin says, "This whole tendency to put what are scarce public funds into conventions centers and ... ephemeral projects is delusional."
But politicians claim that stadiums increase the number of jobs.
Not so, says J.C. Bradbury, author of "The Baseball Economist: The Real Game Exposed." "There's a huge consensus among economists that there is no economic development benefit to having these stadiums," he says.
The stadiums do create jobs for construction workers and some vendors. But "it's a case of the seen and the unseen," Bradbury says, alluding to the 19th-century French economist Frederic Bastiat. "It's very easy to see a new stadium going up. ... But what you don't see is that something else didn't get built across town. ... It's just transferring from one place to the other.
"People don't bury their entertainment dollars in a coffee can in their backyard and then dig it up when a baseball team comes to town. They switch it from something else."
Stadiums are among the more foolish of politicians' boondoggles. There are only 81 home baseball games a year and 41 basketball games. How does that sustain a neighborhood economy?
But the arrogance of city planners knows no end. Now Cleveland is spending taxpayers' money on a medical convention center that they say will turn Cleveland into a "Disney World" for doctors. Well, Chicago's $1 billion expansion of the country's biggest convention center -- McCormick Place -- was unable to prevent an annual drop in conventions, and analysts say America already has 40 percent more convention space than it needs.
Politicians would be better stewards of their cities if they set simple rules and then just got out of the way. I won't hold my breath.
Sorry, but there is no way that I’ll believe that Cleveland is worse than Detroit.
“a medical convention center”
An incredibly stoopid idea.
I live in the suburbs of Cleveland. You are right, it is visibly not nearly as bad as Detroit. I don’t know how they are doing fiscally, but (a Big but) the city has been run by democrats for decades now. Most of the county politicians are being indicted for corruption. There are some very very bad areas, but it is not at the heart of the city. I would not put us in the same category as Detroit (YET!).
I live in the suburbs of Cleveland. You are right, it is visibly not nearly as bad as Detroit. I don’t know how they are doing fiscally, but (a Big but) the city has been run by democrats for decades now. Most of the county politicians are being indicted for corruption. There are some very very bad areas, but it is not at the heart of the city. I would not put us in the same category as Detroit (YET!).
Sorry, but there is no way that I’ll believe that Cleveland is worse than Detroit.
Does Detroit still qualify as a city? Isn’t it now a former city?
Good point. I think it probably still has enough population to qualify statistically, but functionally I think you're correct.
You have to remember that Dennis Kucinich drove Cleveland into bankruptcy when he was mayor and he was very proud of it. Perhaps it has never recovered from it
In a day and age when we can systematize to the most efficient and functioning of complexity in almost every and any field, the fact that we haven’t managed to do so in local, state and federal government really is a marker of humankind’s limits...
The leftist organization ACORN is exposed, fails, and changes its name. I wonder what the name of Detroit will be ten years from now.
Wow ..... I visited Detroit for a few hours in 1979, and while the RenCen was nearly new and very impressive (I liked the conversation alcoves overhanging the atrium), nevertheless the rot around 10-Mile Road and down through the southern part of the city, which was where I drove out, was palpable even then. I've read since then that some of the old working-family suburbs like Hamtramck and Inkster have practically disappeared -- "ghost 'burbs" -- and that they consist mostly now of gradually breaking-up pavement and scattered buildings, and lots of cleared (more or less) lots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.