Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police act swiftly after gun purchases
Mall Tribune ^ | 9 March, 2010 | Anita Burke

Posted on 03/11/2010 7:54:48 PM PST by marktwain

Concerns about an Oregon Department of Transportation employee who purchased several guns after being placed on leave prompted law enforcement across Southern Oregon to step in. Negotiators and a SWAT team from Medford police safely took a man — whose name wasn't released — into protective custody Monday morning in the 500 block of Effie Street, Medford police said in a news release. He was taken to Rogue Valley Medical Center for a mental-health evaluation. The man recently had been placed on administrative leave from his job and was "very disgruntled," the news release said. ODOT Communications Director Patrick Cooney said there were administrative, personnel matters involved that limited what the department could discuss. However, the state agency had reported concerns about the man to law enforcement agencies, who started monitoring him, officials said. "We had concerning information regarding a personnel issue and were watching the subject," Jackson County Sheriff Mike Winters said. In two days, the man bought a Heckler & Koch .45-caliber universal self-loading handgun, a Walther .380-caliber handgun and an AK-47 assault rifle, Medford police Lt. Bob Hansen said. All of those firearms were purchased legally, with required record checks by the Oregon State Police. Authorities were "extremely concerned" that the man may have been planning to retaliate against his employers, the news release said. "Instead of being reactive, we took a proactive approach," OSP Sgt. Jeff Proulx said. Douglas and Jackson County sheriff's departments, OSP officers based in both counties and police in Medford and Roseburg collaborated, he said. Medford police watched the man's home overnight, starting at about 9 p.m. Sunday, Hansen said.

(Excerpt) Read more at mailtribune.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: banglist; detention; donutwatch; habeascorpus; or; thoughtcrime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Something smells. This fellow committed not crime, already owned guns, and bought a couple more, so he can be forcibly required to undergo mental evaluation? Is there any downside for his accusers?
1 posted on 03/11/2010 7:54:48 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Reading between the lines, it sounds like there may have been a fairly aggressive interchange with his employer and the employer was concerned, and maybe rightly so. I’m inclined to give this the benefit of the doubt.


2 posted on 03/11/2010 8:01:54 PM PST by Wicket (God bless and protect our troops and God bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
There has GOT to be more to this. The cops hooked him up for what he MIGHT have done? That's "brain police" stuff.

I'd have hated as much as the next guy to see him pop a gasket and do something stupid but there would have to have been threats or calls from his friends and neighbors or something to warrant this action.

3 posted on 03/11/2010 8:03:45 PM PST by Tucsonican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

AH yes mind crimes we think you are about to do something bad,so we will protect you...

Concerns about an Oregon Department of Transportation employee who purchased several guns after being placed on leave prompted law enforcement across Southern Oregon to step in.

Negotiators and a SWAT team from Medford police safely took a man — whose name wasn’t released — into protective custody Monday morning in the 500 block of Effie Street, Medford police said in a news release.

He was taken to Rogue Valley Medical Center for a mental-health evaluation.

The man recently had been placed on administrative leave from his job and was “very disgruntled,” the news release


4 posted on 03/11/2010 8:05:12 PM PST by GSP.FAN (These are the times that try men's souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This doesn’t sound legal. I smell a law suit.


5 posted on 03/11/2010 8:05:19 PM PST by BreezyDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wicket
I’m inclined to give this the benefit of the doubt

Based on the information given, I am not.

6 posted on 03/11/2010 8:06:12 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wicket
I am not inclined to give the benefit of the doubt to the authorities. The benefit of the doubt ALWAYS should go to the people. Preemptive action against citizens is not provided for in the constitution.
7 posted on 03/11/2010 8:06:22 PM PST by 'smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

Yep, someone just won the lawsuit lottery.


8 posted on 03/11/2010 8:09:01 PM PST by ATLDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ATLDiver

Yup, and beleive me dozens if not over 100 lawyers are itching to defend this guy in a civil suit.


9 posted on 03/11/2010 8:12:39 PM PST by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Well... he’s got no reason to be disgruntled anymore. He’s going to be able to retire very wealthy now.

10 million from ODOT and another 15 or 20 million from the city police ought to do it. Maybe they’ll think before doing it to anybody else.


10 posted on 03/11/2010 8:16:06 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wicket
I’m inclined to give this the benefit of the doubt.

You are giving the benefit of the doubt to the side that is controlling the release of information. He has been charged with nothing and was detained for exercising his second amendment rights. A person should not be detained for crimes they might commit.

11 posted on 03/11/2010 8:18:36 PM PST by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

Maybe. But most people are not put on leave for no reason. I hate to see the thought police but this might be a time when the police acted prudently. If nothing else, the guy goes home in a few days and rethinks what he might have been planning.


12 posted on 03/11/2010 8:20:34 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Truth - Reality through the eyes of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

Well this is what people that find themselves unfairly accused or targets my LEO need to start doing. Chances are the police will return his guns, apologize and hope this quietly goes away. Best thing this guy could do is get attached to a lawyer with the NRA-ILA and bring suite against the city and county.

While we’re at it, innocent victims of no-knock warrants need to sue the responsible county and/or city. While I’m LEO, the no-knock practices need to end.


13 posted on 03/11/2010 8:21:33 PM PST by ATLDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: paul51
The media loves to sensationalize stories like this.
If someone randomly arrested me, they would talk about the "...thousands of rounds of ammunition..." found in my house...as if that means anything.
The guy wanted to purchase a sweet new Heckler & Koch and there is no crime in that. In fact, mine reside nicely next to my various Sig Sauer pistols.
Somebody will hopefully get their hand smacked HARD for this absurd action.
14 posted on 03/11/2010 8:31:35 PM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 'smith

The placed on “ administrative leave” piece is the key. If I were laid off due to budget cuts I might go purchase some recreational items to go spend my new found leisure time with- none of their business. If I had a threatening blow-up with a supervisor or co-workers and was relieved of duty it could and should be viewed differently.

Most of us want the authorities to be responsive to the Islamic radical or the abusive live-in so we have to give them some gray area to operate.

A Libertarian on the surface could proclaim police state abuse but if it was your sister’s ex one might perhaps be less dispassionate.


15 posted on 03/11/2010 8:34:24 PM PST by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: One Name
I am an Oregon FFL and deal with the authorities all the time, and in my experience the are capable, caring, good people, HOWEVER, that does not give them extralegal authority to detain/arrest a citizen who has committed no crime. Simple.
16 posted on 03/11/2010 8:39:29 PM PST by 'smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
In two days, the man bought a Heckler & Koch .45-caliber universal self-loading handgun, a Walther .380-caliber handgun and an AK-47 assault rifle, Medford police Lt. Bob Hansen said.

Perhaps he got the severance pay and decided to spend it on some fun stuff?

17 posted on 03/11/2010 8:48:06 PM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 'smith

I am a state official in the midwest who has had to make mental health referrals on LEO’s on active duty and relieve them of their armed positions. Its a tough call but I know public safety, err on the conservative side if you’re an official. No crime (yet) but not so simple.


18 posted on 03/11/2010 8:49:54 PM PST by One Name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This is where our government is heading. I am kind of wondering what would have happened if he had stood his ground in his own home and waited for them to commit themselves to a dynamic entry, him taking out at least one or more SWAT team members, with the rest of the gang shooting him 150 times or so - all to prevent a crime law enforcement that hadn’t taken place?

The police state is here now.


19 posted on 03/11/2010 8:54:56 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: One Name

I don’t envy you! I’m sure you are a good person and am glad the decisions you make are in your hands, however, no man is above the law no matter how wise and good his intentions. I have refused to sell guns to people who make me uneasy. I am not a government official and that is my right. An agent of the government, however, does not have the luxury of going by their instincts. You must follow the law so that we are protected from government officials who are not good people.


20 posted on 03/11/2010 9:05:49 PM PST by 'smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson