Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/04/2010 1:04:04 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmithL

There is no depth below which dim-bulb-crats will not go.


2 posted on 03/04/2010 1:07:55 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I just went over to Wikipedia and they have listed all of his “controversies”. He is also an avowed athiest. He definately has many “ethical” challenges against him also.


4 posted on 03/04/2010 1:10:45 PM PST by acoulterfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

“Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., 79”?
What do ya have to do to get these too old fools out of there?
This guy sits in diapers and drools and craps himself and is in charge of taxes?


5 posted on 03/04/2010 1:19:10 PM PST by Joe Boucher (Just say NO to RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Apparently, Pelosi was robbing the cradle by replacing the 79 year old Rangel with the 78 year old Stark.

Good grief arn’t these guys supposed to have a great retirment plan and why don’t they start using it??


6 posted on 03/04/2010 1:26:25 PM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Have you noticed how ancient these guys are? No wonder they don’t care what happens to this country, they will never live to see the consequences. Why can’t we have a rule that they must retire at 70?


7 posted on 03/04/2010 1:26:51 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Yeah...I’m SURE he WILLINGLY turned down the opportunity to be the most powerful guy in the house, just to stay where he was!!! Uh huh. And Husseincare will LOWER the deficit.


9 posted on 03/04/2010 1:34:52 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I don’t see any greater degree of competence, or lesser degree of two evils.


10 posted on 03/04/2010 1:50:20 PM PST by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Stark is just another dim bulb Dimocrat.


11 posted on 03/04/2010 1:57:42 PM PST by hgro (Jerry Riversd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Not surprised...I told my wifey last night that the best thing that could happen would be for the lunatic Stark to be elevated to the leader of this committee. He would have his foot in his big mouth on a routine basis.


12 posted on 03/04/2010 2:07:09 PM PST by Cuttnhorse ("Peace" is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading. (Anon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I loved the voicemail in which Stark challenged an Iraq War vet to tell him why he thought he was such a "great G-damn hero." That just endeared him to me so much.

It's too bad Stark didn't take this high-profile opportunity. He would have really polished the Dumbocrat image.

13 posted on 03/04/2010 2:15:31 PM PST by GenXFreedomFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Pelosi is learning. It is widely believed that her replacement of John Dingle with the my-way-or-the-highway Marxist, Henry Waxman, is what sparked the abortion funding fued and ultimately killed any chance of passing a bill that the Senate could pass. Now they’re stuck with trying to pass the Senate bill.


14 posted on 03/04/2010 2:46:59 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL; Da Coyote; acoulterfan; Joe Boucher; rod1; McGavin999; Oldpuppymax; DGHoodini; hgro; ...

The senescent following the decrepit.

It’s, it’s like the last days of the old Politburo.


15 posted on 03/04/2010 3:41:57 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I’m so darned disappointed. I was reviewing Pete Stark’s Greatest Hits on YouTube yesterday evening and I was rubbing my hands in anticipatory glee, thinking of how the fur would fly with him on the big stage.


17 posted on 03/04/2010 4:37:29 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

“Today, Stark said in an exclusive interview that he prefers to remain chairman of the Ways and Means Health Subcommittee “

Suuuuure.....


18 posted on 03/05/2010 12:58:15 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Rep. Pete Stark won't become interim chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.
Perhaps even the Demwits found he was too crazed.
24 posted on 03/14/2010 4:55:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (http://themagicnegro.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson