Posted on 03/01/2010 8:12:33 PM PST by neverdem
February, 2010, was the first month since 2007 with sunspots every day according to Spaceweather.com for February 27. A quick check of February 28 confirms the streak. So far there have been only 2 spot-free days in 2010. By comparison there were 260 spot-free days in 2009, and there have been 772 spot-free days since 2004. What this means is that one of the quietest periods of solar activity in recent history may be coming to an end.
The relevance of this is that sunspot activity has been proposed by many, such as Geerts and Linacre , as a possible driver of Earth's climate patterns, including global warming and cooling cycles. As with most climate theory, the science has not been settled on the link between sunspots and Earth's climate.
Most, but not all according to some. Global Warming theory is considered so sacred and settled that until recently any scientist who questioned the tenets of its conclusion that human activity is the primary driver of climate change were subject to all but ridicule and censure. Recent events, including the Climategate scandal and a series of years where global temperature has stayed about the same, have tempered this attitude.
But now the sunspots come back and we, as junior scientists are presented with the opportunity to test the hypothesis. If sunspot activity increases, and other factors such as prevalence of greenhouse gases, volcanic activity, and known cycles such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation continue in their recent patterns and temperature increases, then we may conclude that sunspots do indeed affect Earth's climate. If not, then we can eliminate sunspots as a significant contributor to climate change.
We also have the opportunity to make another observation in the realm of the social sciences. If sunspot activity does increase and temperatures increase even when other factors are accounted for, then if there are any individuals with a vested interest in the carbon trading industry it would be expected that these individuals will attribute the rise in temperatures to CO2 levels increasing. If no one makes such claims then we can conclude that everyone is really interested in the facts only and have no vested interest in controlling carbon consumption.
A scientist would wait for the data to come in. A gambler would lay odds on another round of global warming hysteria if temperatures rise no matter what the real reason.
Tom Bruner is not a scientist.
There are sunspots and then there are BIG sunspots. So far there are no big sunspots! I go to this site for my sunspot news: http://www.solarcycle24.com/
Does anyone know if the polarity of the sunspots has changed from that of this past cycle? If not, this grouping does not count toward a new trend.
Is it 2012 yet? :)
Cheers!
The Global Warming crowd are hoping and praying that there's a huge number of very large sunspots hiding just under the Sun's "surface" waiting to be launched out on a gigantic under corona conveyor belt.
The sun today = they aren't very big but at least they're starting -
Algore is aroused.
Once that happens, then all the other sunspots share that new polarity, right? I thought I’d read late last year that this hadn’t really switched over, but I must be wrong.
If so, this sunspot cycle has been a very slow starter. It is one thing if the last one fizzled out over a long time, it is another that the new cycle doesn’t get going.
Boy, I wonder if such small sunspots could even be noticed by astronomers going back to the 17th century (Maunder Minimum).
/johnny
Ain’t that the truth.
Question:
If the polar bear is swimming and gets hit by a sunspot, is that going to melt more ice than if he was feasting on a seal on a ice flow when he got hit by a sunspot??
Enquiring minds and all!
Time to fire up the shortwave, been pretty silent for a while. Wish I still had the good one
LOL...no offense intended but it struck me as funny that someone had a regular source for their sunspot news.
...I read somewhere that one theory that the general sun magnetic field is weakening...it needs a certain amount of magnetic field for sunspots to form.
Sunspot activity increasing?
Time to stop buying carbon credits and start selling!
You can make money from the sun!!!!!
(PS: That might be a green job)
dit dah dit JRandomFreeper
It’s tough to get a kid interested in ham radio when all my DX stories are from the good ol’ days.
dit dit
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.