Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plan to Seek Use of U.S. Contracts as a Wage Lever
New York Times ^ | February 26, 2010 | Steven Greenhouse

Posted on 02/26/2010 5:07:36 AM PST by reaganaut1

The Obama administration is planning to use the government’s enormous buying power to prod private companies to improve wages and benefits for millions of workers, according to White House officials and several interest groups briefed on the plan.

By altering how it awards $500 billion in contracts each year, the government would disqualify more companies with labor, environmental or other violations and give an edge to companies that offer better levels of pay, health coverage, pensions and other benefits, the officials said.

Because nearly one in four workers is employed by companies that have contracts with the federal government, administration officials see the plan as a way to shape social policy and lift more families into the middle class. It would affect contracts like those awarded to make Army uniforms, clean federal buildings and mow lawns at military bases.

Although the details are still being worked out, the outline of the plan is drawing fierce opposition from business groups and Republican lawmakers. They see it as a gift to organized labor and say it would drive up costs for the government in the face of a $1.3 trillion budget deficit.

“I’m suspicious of what the end goals are,” said Ben Brubeck, director of labor and federal procurement for Associated Builders and Contractors, which represents 25,000 construction-related companies. “It’s pretty clear the agenda is to give big labor an advantage in federal contracts.”

Critics also said the policy would put small businesses, many of which do not provide rich benefits, at a disadvantage. Furthermore, government officials would find it difficult to evaluate bidders using the new criteria and to determine whether one company’s compensation package should give it an edge, said Alan L. Chvotkin, executive vice president of the Professional Services Council, a coalition of 340 government contractors.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: livingwage; obamanomics; socialism; spreadthewealth; spredthewealth; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
We have a $1.3 trillion dollar deficit, and this idiot wants to INCREASE government expenses in order to pay off unions and other Democratic interest groups.
1 posted on 02/26/2010 5:07:36 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

bump


2 posted on 02/26/2010 5:11:02 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA
One step closer to armed revolution, keep up the Marxism Obama.
3 posted on 02/26/2010 5:13:17 AM PST by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 393)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Bookmarked


4 posted on 02/26/2010 5:13:56 AM PST by Shaun_MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
This is coming straight from the Bolsheviks:

Two of Mr. Obama’s allies — John Podesta, the Clinton administration chief of staff who headed the president’s transition team, and Andy Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union — have repeatedly pressed the president to use procurement policy to push up wages and benefits.

5 posted on 02/26/2010 5:14:14 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

He’s spreading the wealth around.

So how’s that hopey changey thing working for ya? /sarc


6 posted on 02/26/2010 5:14:39 AM PST by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Sounds like we are going back to the 1800’s where government contracts were political prizes given to the cronies and supporters of the party in power.


7 posted on 02/26/2010 5:17:05 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The administration believes that giving companies a small tax break to hire unemployed people would boost jobs.

If they really believe that, than they must also believe that forcing companies to pay people MORE money and MORE benefits will cost jobs.


8 posted on 02/26/2010 5:20:19 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Get back to me when they shut the borders, enforce existing immigration law, and let market forces then price labor fairly.

Until then , Obamunism is on a collision path with a reality that may be very unpleasant.


9 posted on 02/26/2010 5:23:53 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I thought competitive bidding was called for???
10 posted on 02/26/2010 5:33:07 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

You just explained the idiocy of the Obama administration economic policy in one sentence.

Great job.


11 posted on 02/26/2010 5:44:53 AM PST by MindBender26 (Prezdet Obama is what you get when you let the O.J. jury select a president !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; All

Sounds just like what Herbert Hoover and FDR did, policies which led to the Great Depression.


12 posted on 02/26/2010 5:48:44 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction (Is it spring yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Does this mean gov’t won’t be getting us the best deal for the money?

Wouldn’t this just be another gov’t subsidy?


13 posted on 02/26/2010 5:52:57 AM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

President Obama will look into the camera while doing his best Richard Nixon imitation and state with a straight face:

” I’m not a socialist”


14 posted on 02/26/2010 5:56:20 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge
” I’m not a socialist”,

I am not a crook

I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

15 posted on 02/26/2010 5:57:10 AM PST by NeoCaveman ("workers of the world unite, it's not just a slogan anymore" SEIU's Andy Stern)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

You forgot—Read My Lips...NO new taxes.


16 posted on 02/26/2010 6:01:35 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
By altering how it awards $500 billion in contracts each year, the government would disqualify more companies with labor, environmental or other violations and give an edge to companies that offer better levels of pay, health coverage, pensions and other benefits, the officials said.

But, has the Pay Czar approve higher wages, when we can get the job done cheaper? What am I missing? Obama logic apparently.

17 posted on 02/26/2010 6:16:17 AM PST by w1andsodidwe (How can you tell when the President is lying? When his lips move, of course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Weren’t sticky wages (i.e. artificially high wages, not subject to market forces) one of the causes of high and prolonged unemployment during the Depression?


18 posted on 02/26/2010 6:24:57 AM PST by hc87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hc87

Yes.


19 posted on 02/26/2010 6:27:05 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction (Is it spring yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction

It’s not a lever, it’s a balance.

Put more weight on one end, you need to take more from other people.


20 posted on 02/26/2010 8:16:41 AM PST by BenKenobi (And into this Ring he poured his cruelty, his malice and his will to dominate all life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson