Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative, Pro-Life Leaders to Sign Mount Vernon Statement of Principles
Life News ^ | 2/16/10 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 02/16/2010 3:56:41 PM PST by wagglebee

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Seeking a statement of principles heading into the 2010 mid-term elections, a group of prominent conservative and pro-life leaders are gathering tomorrow to do just that. They will sign the Mount Vernon Statement near George Washington's Mount Vernon home on Wednesday afternoon.

The list of signers reads like a who's who of the pro-life and conservative political communities including former Attorney General Ed Meese, Heritage Foundation President Edwin Feulner, and Wendy Wright, the president of Concerned Women for America.

"The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant," the statement will say. "Some insist that America must change, cast off the old and put on the new. But where would this lead — forward or backward, up or down? Isn't this idea of change an empty promise or even a dangerous deception?"

"The change we urgently need, a change consistent with the American ideal, is not movement away from but toward our founding principles," the statement says.

It mentions the right to life in saying, ""The conservatism of the Declaration asserts self-evident truths based on the laws of nature and nature's God. It defends life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

The statement is seen as a modern-day equivalent and updating of the Sharon Statement, a 1960 statement headed by William F. Buckley of National Review and conservative members of Young Americans for Freedom.

Brent Bozell, the president of the Media Research Center and Buckley's nephew, is also heading up the "Constitutional Conservatism" document ad hopes it will bring in millions of signatures online.

Tony Perkins, the head of the Family Research Council, emailed LifeNews.com about the Mount Vernon Statement.

"This will be a significant moment as social, fiscal, and national security conservatives come together to declare the importance of working together to defend our nation's founding principles," he says.

"The three-legged conservative coalition must remain unified behind these core beliefs to prepare for the challenges ahead and successfully confront a hostile Congress and Obama Administration," Perkins adds.

American Spectator publisher Alfred Regnery, another signer, told Politico that the statement is a response to some who say conservatives and the Republican Party needs to move towards the center and abandon its principles, such as the pro-life perspective.

"There has been some criticism in certain quarters of the conservative movement that the movement needs to become more mainstream, more centrist," he said.

Federalist Society co-founder David McIntosh, and Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist, among others, plan to sign the document. Also included are Coalition for a Conservative Majority Chairman Ken Blackwell; former Reagan Domestic Policy Adviser Ken Cribb; and Let Freedom Ring President Colin Hanna.

“In recent decades, America’s principles have been undermined and redefined in our culture, our universities and our politics,” the Mt. Vernon Statement says. “The self-evident truths of 1776 have been supplanted by the notion that no such truths exist. The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant."

Related web sites:
Mount Vernon Statement - http://www.themountvernonstatement.com



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; conservatism; moralabsolutes; mountvernon; prolife
“In recent decades, America’s principles have been undermined and redefined in our culture, our universities and our politics,” the Mt. Vernon Statement says. “The self-evident truths of 1776 have been supplanted by the notion that no such truths exist. The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant."

America WILL NOT survive if this doesn't change.

1 posted on 02/16/2010 3:56:41 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 02/16/2010 3:57:07 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 02/16/2010 3:57:28 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Mt. Vernon pro-life accord


4 posted on 02/16/2010 4:02:50 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Rush was talking about this Mount Vernon Group today ... Blue-blood RINOs vs the Tea Party people.
5 posted on 02/16/2010 4:03:47 PM PST by Tarpon ( ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Statement should include an encouragement for all pro-life citizens to stop boycotting the electoral process.

Could also include a statement acknowledging that an immediate concern is to keep the country from self-destructing (so that there is something left to America when we someday have a pro-life culture).


6 posted on 02/16/2010 4:31:55 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Do we know to what extent the Mount Vernon Statement will be Pro-Life? It wasn’t clear to me from the article, other than in that some of the signers disagree with the idea of “moderating” the party.


7 posted on 02/16/2010 7:32:29 PM PST by Duodecim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Duodecim

sounds like they are taking on more than Pro-Life matters. One-size fits all statements ... how much of it will be useful in areas of the Northeast which the libs have a stranglehold on?

I would like to see a regional “Statement of Principles”.


8 posted on 02/16/2010 8:17:22 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Yeah, I agree, but I now see how my language before was unclear. I know that it has non-Pro-Life content, but I wonder to what extent it does say anything Pro-Life. As I write this comment, I cannot see whether I read about this in this thread or another one, but Rush Limbaugh evidently talked about this briefly this afternoon, and he said that there were a few people from this committee who insisted on having all of the “social” issue material (where abortion is categorized, for some reason) removed. This article indicates that there’s at least something Pro-Life about this document, but I wonder whether it is vague about it, or endorses the Pro-Life view outright and then quickly moves on (as though they just wanted to stick it in there to pacify somebody), or whether it seems to have been something that somebody actually thought about, stating it in the thoughtful, reasoned way that I think simultaneously would neutralize or undermine a lot of the “Pro-Choice” objection to it and would more potently argue for the Pro-Life position.


9 posted on 02/17/2010 3:49:24 AM PST by Duodecim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Duodecim

If we can first get back to the real Constitution, then the Life issue will be a whole lot easier to address.


10 posted on 02/17/2010 11:57:19 AM PST by wizard1961 (Teaper says: For 2010, let Sarah be Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wizard1961

Yes.


11 posted on 02/17/2010 1:03:05 PM PST by Duodecim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson