Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JasonC

Didn’t the Confederacy strengthen their central government more and more during the war?


4 posted on 02/15/2010 3:38:10 PM PST by GeronL (Dignity is earned from yourself. Respect is earned from others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL
Yep. The so-called "free" South in over 150 separate areas investigated by Richard Bensel in his book Yankee Leviathan had a worse record for white human rights; a worse record on property rights (higher taxes, confiscation, etc.) and a more centralized government than the Union.

On, and the Confederacy had this little thing in its Constitution called slavery . . . three times. It stated that even if a state somehow banned slavery, it had to protect the rights of slaveholders who brought their slaves into that state. Yeah, that sounds like "states' rights" to me. (sarcasm)

12 posted on 02/15/2010 3:44:23 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

Governor Brown of Georgia had no use for the Confederacy’s centralizing tendencies. But the CSA was not only beset by central government oppression. The Confederate regime was also characterized by many local petty tyrants who were no more than glorified thugs with pretensions. It wasn’t just black Southerners that the great Lincoln helped to liberate.


22 posted on 02/15/2010 3:50:07 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson