To: Free ThinkerNY
One good thing about executive orders is that the next president can completely overturn the orders.
2 posted on
02/12/2010 7:52:34 PM PST by
o_zarkman44
(Obama is the ultimate LIE!)
To: o_zarkman44
One good thing about executive orders is that the next president can completely overturn the orders.IF, we can survive the next three years.
15 posted on
02/12/2010 7:56:56 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM where are you?)
To: o_zarkman44
three to seven years from now, once Obama’s influence on the courts and the bureaucracy fully sets in. The only thing good about Obama is that he’s scaring people into paying more attention to politics. The bad thing is that he’s distracting people away from some of the other examples of rot that have been eating away at the rest of the federal government and the country at large for decades now.
23 posted on
02/12/2010 8:03:37 PM PST by
dr_who
To: o_zarkman44
++++One good thing about executive orders is that the next president can completely overturn the orders.++++
There will likely be no next president.
To: o_zarkman44
26 posted on
02/12/2010 8:06:15 PM PST by
ExTexasRedhead
(Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
To: o_zarkman44
One good thing about executive orders is that the next president can completely overturn the orders. Assuming that we last long enough to have a 'next president.'
Everything I see from an economic, domestic and security policy basis of this gang of Chicago thugs and their lap dog majority in Congress is that the seem intent on destroying the nation, and doing it as quickly as possible.
I don't think they are 'stupid.' I think it's intentional, and even if some EO or group of them are blatantly Unconstitutional, it may be a moot since the Republic will be in ruins before the Supreme Court gets to hear a case.
28 posted on
02/12/2010 8:07:29 PM PST by
Ditto
(Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
To: o_zarkman44
When he signs the first one, we all need to meet in D.C. with the torches and pitchforks and Inform him, we will no longer tolerate his thuggery!
46 posted on
02/12/2010 8:20:32 PM PST by
Freddd
To: o_zarkman44
They rarely do. Each succeeding president for the most part retains the work of past presidents as they use them as precedent. The continuing evolution of the imperial; presidency. Notice how many executive orders Obama is reversing? Not many at all...
48 posted on
02/12/2010 8:22:43 PM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: o_zarkman44
The White House is unraveling exponentially. The events of the last year, especially the last month, are wearing on Obama. . You can see it in his face, hear it in his voice. . The Narcissistic Rage is fomenting and imho our country is in danger from within. Who is Obama and What is he going to do as things spiral out of control? Daily more and more people understand his background, his history, his Marxist mentors, his communist mole background. The internet is viral with this information. The more it spreads the more he spirals downwards. Do you hear that Black Hole sucking sound yet? Event horizon closing fast. . .
To: o_zarkman44
To: o_zarkman44
One good thing about executive orders is that the next president can completely overturn the orders. Carter banned nuclear fuel reprocessing. It has never been reversed.
112 posted on
02/12/2010 10:43:44 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The RINOcrat Party is in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
To: o_zarkman44
And a Congress that is dramatically changed can refuse to fund the “executive orders” Resist. Always.
To: o_zarkman44
I believe that 3/4 of Congress can overturn an EO if done within 30 days. Of course it’s not going to happen. I also thought there were limitions on the types of EO’s a President could enact. Rahm sounds like a lot more over reaching is being considered here.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson