Skip to comments.
Muslim-American body issues fatwa against airport body scanners
Times of India ^
| February 12, 2010
Posted on 02/12/2010 7:09:10 AM PST by Schnucki
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: onedoug
I get sick of an annual invasion of ants every spring in my house.
All I can do is spread bait and let them take the poison back to the rest of the nest in hopes of killing as much of the current generation.
Its all about buying time through attrition.
21
posted on
02/12/2010 7:23:17 AM PST
by
Eye of Unk
("Either you are with us or you are for the terrorists." ~~George W. Bush)
To: Schnucki
You know, I'm not wild about it, either, but I didn't put the ball in motion to make it an issue. Were I Muslim, I'd shut up, sit down and if I wanted to fly, I'd fly without weapons disguised as harmless objects. I don't want to be scanned by a man, nor should a man be scanned by a woman. Let's keep it as inoffensive as possible, and Muslims (American or otherwise) can sit on their fatwa and twirl since we have all be “inconvenienced” by their “inconvenient truth.”
To: Cindy; Velveeta; LucyT; Rushmore Rocks; WestCoastGal; FARS; Candor7
23
posted on
02/12/2010 7:23:48 AM PST
by
Oorang
(Tyranny thrives where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people - Alex Kozinski)
To: Schnucki
A Muslim fatwa complaining about airport body scanners? If it weren’t for Muslim fatwas, we wouldn’t need body scanners in the first place.
These people have no sense of irony.
24
posted on
02/12/2010 7:24:07 AM PST
by
Texas Mulerider
(Rap music: hieroglyphics with a beat.)
To: Schnucki
Yeah, I’ve got their fatwa right over here.
25
posted on
02/12/2010 7:24:15 AM PST
by
The Cajun
(Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
To: isthisnickcool
26
posted on
02/12/2010 7:25:16 AM PST
by
240B
(he is doing everything he said he would'nt and not doing what he said he would)
To: Constitutions Grandchild
“...since we have all be inconvenienced by their inconvenient truth.
Should be “...all been “inconvenienced”...”. Geez, what is it this morning?
To: Schnucki
Next Up:
A fatwa against going to the doctor?
28
posted on
02/12/2010 7:26:49 AM PST
by
cookcounty
(Let us not speak of the honor of men. Rather, let us bind them with the Constitution. --Jefferson)
To: Schnucki
Hey Ahmad, how’s that fatwa against committing acts of terrorism coming? Still nothing? Hello?
29
posted on
02/12/2010 7:28:09 AM PST
by
Apparatchik
(If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
To: Schnucki
Let’s all take up a collection to buy full body scanners for our local airports.
30
posted on
02/12/2010 7:28:57 AM PST
by
mrsdeb
(I didn't expect THAT to happen.)
To: Schnucki
NO SCAN ... NO FLY ... NO PROBLEM
31
posted on
02/12/2010 7:29:46 AM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(OBAMA ... Orwell's 1984 was a WARNING ... NOT a TEXTBOOK!!!)
To: Pilated
I would feel much more comfortable knowing the plane I was flying on had no muslims aboard.
If they won’t go through the scanners then they can stay off the planes.
Works for me.
32
posted on
02/12/2010 7:30:15 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(The liberals are asking us to give Obama more time. Is 25 to life enough?)
To: Schnucki
Notice that the story is reported by
33
posted on
02/12/2010 7:30:23 AM PST
by
cookcounty
(Let us not speak of the honor of men. Rather, let us bind them with the Constitution. --Jefferson)
To: rocksblues; Schnucki
Aha! A handy, effective way to "profile" Muslims. Everyody gets a full-body scan except those who refuse (that would be the Muslims), who have thus self-selected for either a full-body search (with MRI's and CT scans to detect antying that might have been inserted internally --- all at the expense of the search-ee)...
Or they don't fly.
34
posted on
02/12/2010 7:33:24 AM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Point of clarification.)
To: cookcounty
Notice that the story is reported by
The Times of India.
Why is it that the Americans have to go 5,000 miles to get a real newspaper?????????????????????
35
posted on
02/12/2010 7:33:58 AM PST
by
cookcounty
(Let us not speak of the honor of men. Rather, let us bind them with the Constitution. --Jefferson)
To: reagan_fanatic
**If they wont go through the scanners then they can stay off the planes.**
If they don’t.. I sure AM NOT getting on that plane!!! I don’t have to be ANYWHERE ..that badly
36
posted on
02/12/2010 7:37:29 AM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(OBAMA ... Orwell's 1984 was a WARNING ... NOT a TEXTBOOK!!!)
To: Schnucki
Headline: Non-Muslim Americans Support a Fatwa Prohibiting Muslims from Visiting or Living on American Soil, or from Flying on Any Public Airline.
37
posted on
02/12/2010 7:39:35 AM PST
by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: Lazamataz
Let them stick with their old technology... what mohammed endorsed.
Camelback.
To: cookcounty
Wasn’t the Muslim exception the reason why the BVD Bomber was able to get his undies on the plane?
39
posted on
02/12/2010 7:40:03 AM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Kakaze
This is about one thing, being able to stuff explosives in a body cavity and not be detected.Body scanners do not see inside the body. It's not an MRI...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson