Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voting For Higher Taxes (Tax The Other Fellow, Stupid Alert)
National Review ^ | 1/28/2010 | Stephen Spruiell

Posted on 01/28/2010 11:57:06 AM PST by goldstategop

When Scott Brown was elected to the Senate in Massachusetts, it was because he rode a “wave of voter frustration” (Associated Press) and “capitalized on voters’ disaffection with the status quo” (New York Times). “Anger” and “antipathy toward federal-government activism,” more than support for Brown, drove Massachusetts’s voters to go with the Republican (Washington Post).

When Oregon voters approved tax increases on corporations and families making over $250,000, however, it was because the voters had finally decided to “behave like responsible adults” (Newsweek). It showed that Beaver State voters had bravely “gnawed back fears of tax hikes” (The Olympian) and “ended two decades of tax scrimping” (L.A. Times). What motivated them was the very opposite of the “anti-Washington sentiment” that animated Scott Brown’s campaign (CBS News). In voting for new taxes, voters in Oregon “bucked decades of anti-tax and anti-Salem sentiment” (The Oregonian).

When voters go for higher taxes, they are acting bravely, responsibly, and wisely. When they put Republicans into office, they are throwing “temper tantrums.”

There are a few minor problems with this thesis. Russ Walker, Oregon director for the grassroots group FreedomWorks, explains that the coalition of public-sector unions that supported the tax was able to exploit voter anger at Wall Street. “If Democrats think this is a referendum on their policies in general, they’re making a big mistake,” he says. The coalition that formed to oppose the tax “did a bad job of messaging, and the other side did a very good job of tapping into these populist emotions.”

Walker points to an ad run by the unions that focused on Oregon’s corporate minimum tax. Corporations in Oregon that lose money or find sufficient write-offs pay only a nominal amount of $10. “Costs for the middle class have gone up a lot,” the narrator says. “But big corporations like Wall Street banks and credit-card companies still pay the $10 minimum tax.”

It’s true that corporations use write-offs to avoid paying more than the minimum, but Walker says the new gross-receipts tax — which is retroactive to Jan. 1, 2009 — will hit many businesses that really did lose money last year. Walker says he’s already heard from small-business owners who are planning to relocate out of state, but the real problem is that businesses who might have been attracted to Oregon’s relatively good business climate before will look at the tax hikes and say, “Oh, no thanks.”

Besides the lost jobs and lost opportunities, the top-heavy tax hikes increase the likelihood that the next “boom and bust” revenue cycle will be more intense, leaving an even bigger budget hole. The top 1 percent of Oregonians already pay approximately one-quarter of all the state’s personal-income taxes. High-earners are subject to the greatest fluctuations in income during booms and busts, which leads states with very progressive income taxes to overspend in good years and go broke in bad ones. As business writer Megan McArdle quipped, “Ask New York and California how that's going.”

Some on the left are attempting to inflate the Oregon vote into a victory for Democrats on the same level as the Brown victory for Republicans. The real takeaway is the not-exactly-earthshattering news that voters are okay with taxes if they are sufficiently convinced that they will not have to pay them. As more state governments facing large budget deficits attempt to copy the Oregon model, the challenge for conservatives will be to illustrate ways in which we all pay for tax hikes at the top.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: 2010elections; beaverstate; classwarfare; conservatism; endlessdeficits; highertaxes; incomeredistribution; liberalbankruptcy; liberalism; measure66; measure67; nationalreview; oregon; populism; stevensprueill
What's the message behind the passage of tax increases this week in Oregon - Measures 66 & 67? Well, its really about taxing the other fellow. Voters will be happy to tax someone else as long as they don't have to pay for it. Those same voters reject tax increases aimed at them. So there is a political and practical limit on whom liberals can tax. The Oregon model, originated in California and New York, can only be tried so many times until the well runs dry. The challenge for conservatives is to show taxing businesses and the wealthy ultimately winds up harming every one else's quality of life. The effects of a tax hike do not begin and end with those who can ostensibly pay the bill.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

1 posted on 01/28/2010 11:57:07 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Keep raising those taxes. Raise them as high as they’ll go.

And when you continue to slump economically, scratch your head and wonder why.


2 posted on 01/28/2010 12:03:10 PM PST by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
Keep raising taxes in those states while Texas has produced 57% of all private jobs this year. O Texas has no state income taxes.
3 posted on 01/28/2010 12:16:43 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
It’s true that corporations use write-offs to avoid paying more than the minimum, but Walker says the new gross-receipts tax — which is retroactive to Jan. 1, 2009 — will hit many businesses that really did lose money last year. Walker says he’s already heard from small-business owners who are planning to relocate out of state, but the real problem is that businesses who might have been attracted to Oregon’s relatively good business climate before will look at the tax hikes and say, “Oh, no thanks.”

Oregon has added themselves to a list of states I would never start a business in. CA is top of the list, but my home state of WA is another that is anti-business. Even Boeing moved their corporate headquarters out of state. Of course the local politicans played that down as if it weren't a big deal...yeah, right.

4 posted on 01/28/2010 12:57:05 PM PST by highlander_UW (There's a storm coming - little kid at a Mexican gas station in The Terminator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; coffeebreak; ..
Oregon Ping

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.

5 posted on 01/28/2010 9:39:31 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Wait until the full effect of this insane voting is felt, the brain dead kool-aid drinkers will be mortified.


6 posted on 01/29/2010 12:21:08 PM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson