Posted on 01/09/2010 1:17:04 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Friday's poor employment number will cause political problems for the Democrats as the touted benefits of their policies fail to pass the spin zone. The numbers "saved" ruse will become increasingly absurd as the unemployment number remains stubbornly high. Instead of jobs saved being recycled we might start hearing more about the total jobless rate - which includes discouraged workers no longer looking - that ticked up to 17.3% from 17.2%.
Many of the unemployed are out of work for longer periods of times, stoking a revulsion against incumbents and the leaders of this country that are right now all Democrats. Even the Associated Press has stopped the spin machine for awhile and showed that the hope that propelled Obama to the Presidency is no longer held by millions of people who are too discouraged to seek work.
Even Reuters has started pinning the blame where it belongs: politicians who have injected a lot of uncertainty into the business world and who have enacted or proposed to enact policies that are inimical to hiring because they increase the costs and regulatory burden of each employee.
Who killed the jobs? Democrats.
But there is another number Democrats should fear because it was used by them and then against them three decades ago. This number is the misery index and was used by Jimmy Carter to help him defeat Gerald Ford and then was used by Reagan against Carter a few years later.
The Misery Index is the sum of a nation’s unemployment, interest rates, and inflation figures. Given the Fed’s printing presses are running red hot and the Democrats show a propensity to profligacy, inflation looks to rise in the year ahead. Commodity prices are heading steadily higher, fueled by too much cash, and too much deficit spending. The Democrats have put policies in place that crimp the development of our vast mineral and energy reserves,. These trends are like the pig in the python - eventually the rise in these input prices will be reflected in higher prices for all consumers. A further source of anxiety should be the ever-weakening dollar that makes import prices higher in dollar terms.
The misery index now stands at 12.8%, the highest since 1991 and 3 points above its average since then.
As Business Week reported this past week:
Whichever methodology you use, the misery metric will likely have political implications near-term… U.S. President Barack Obama faces his first midterm congressional elections in November. Their opposition will surely seek to capitalize on voter discomfort with the economy.
That's what happened in 1976 when Jimmy Carter exploited a misery index of around 13% to help defeat Gerald Ford for the Presidency—only to see it rise to more than 20% four years later, costing him the same job. So unless they can cut their current indices, lawmakers could suffer their own form of misery this year: lost elections.
The public likes to have proxies that explain a lot in a simplified form. Hence, the appeal of batting averages, stock market averages, and - in the hands of politicians - the misery index. The appeal is clear: with the anti-incumbency mood sky-high, every politician (and most of them are Democrats and they will be blamed) will face the prospect of having one simple number used against them. The number can be fleshed out a bit with a Reagan-like phrase: are you feeling better off today than 2 (or 4) years ago? Or, a recession is when a neighbor loses his job; a depression is when you lose your job; and a recovery begins when a Democrat loses his.
Watch out Democrats - it is a number that will be haunting you through November and the years beyond.
Misery index won’t rise much until the CPI start to reflect reality.
No doubt about it, commodity inflation has already started in oil, gasoline, and food prices. Then in about two years when the labor market strengthens somewhat, we’ll start to see wage & salary increases and a substantial increase in overall inflation. Taking out the phony adjustments by the Labor department for hydronics and “geometric pricing”, we’ll be getting hit with actual inflation somewhere around 5-7% in a few years. Because there’s so much more global business competition and global production capacity than in the 70s, I don’t think we’ll see double-digit inflation in this decade, but inflation is surely going up substantially from today.
Exactly!
The Fed's balance sheet was $2,275 billion last week, up from $2,211 billion 1 year ago. Wow! It grew about $64 billion, less than 3%.
Red hot just took on a whole new meaning.
True, but the misery index is trending to reach Carter era levels soon (within two months). In reality, it's probably already happened even using official gov't numbers; however, the gov't numbers for December inflation are not yet published. December inflation data is due out on Jan. 15.
Being able to compare Zero's economy with Carter's will be a huge benefit to Republicans.
I've also read a few times that the Labor Dept. has reduced the weighting on food prices substantially in the core CPI in the last 10-15 years. I don't know to what extent they've cut the food weighting, but if so that's helping to hold down the full CPI
Gas went up twelve cents a gallon where I live Friday.
Track the Misery Index here:
http://www.miseryindex.us/customindexbymonth.asp
CPI mitigated the rise in unemployment in most of 2009 (actually indicated deflation), but spiked in November and December.
The Misery Index, at 12.72, is now higher than at any time during the George W. Bush administration, and is rising.
The Misery Index for December was 12.72.
Ironically, this was the exact reading for Jan. of 1977, the first year of the Carter Administration.
This was also the lowest reading of his term in office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.