Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drango
I too DON’T recommend civil disobedience.

I would recommend dragging that child molester judge off the bench and out into the street to be hanged... but, I'm on the other side of the continent...

8 posted on 01/01/2010 4:08:58 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood

THis simply confirms that homosexuals to not reproduce, they recruit.

The mother has a biological attachment to this child, the lesbian lover of the mother has exactly zilch. The judge who ordered such visitation is simply an idiot.

Would you drop off your minor child at the home of anyone with whom you were engaged in custody dispute? Not on your life. If the former lover wants visitation let then come to some supervised location and time. Period. Becuase the likelihood of the Jenkins woman grabbing the kid and running back to Vermont is very high.


17 posted on 01/01/2010 4:21:51 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats: the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

You are dead wrong. This is not a child molester judge. The judges hands are completely tied by the law.

The minute 2 dikes decided they wanted to have a kid, they BOTH became the child’s legal parents. That is the law. And when one divorced the other, the law recognizes the right of BOTH parents to raise their child. Period.

As far as I am concerned, I think homosexual adoption and child rearing should be illegal. A child needs a mommy and daddy, not two of one sex. But as long as states pass laws allowing for dykes to marry and allow them to have children by artificial inseminiation or adoption, then the laws must be followed. And tragically, the law is that both the current and former dyke are the child’s legal parents. I don’t like that, but that is the law. So long as that is the law, the former dyke has no right to deprive the current dyke parent of that person’s legal child.

I completely disagree that she should run off with the child. She made her bed and she has to lie in it. No different than a man getting a woman pregnant and then not wanting to support the child. She had a child with another person and she has no right to deprive the other person of access to their child.

She blew it. She should have done what is right, shared custody, and made it clear to the child that homosexuality is wrong. Now she is going to lose her child to the current dyke permanently.

Tragic.


40 posted on 01/01/2010 6:10:47 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 48... 47... 46...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
I would recommend dragging that child molester judge off the bench and out into the street to be hanged... but, I'm on the other side of the continent...

Would make a great protest sign for outside his house though

"William Cohen is a child molester"

62 posted on 01/01/2010 9:26:15 PM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson