Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

You are dead wrong. This is not a child molester judge. The judges hands are completely tied by the law.

The minute 2 dikes decided they wanted to have a kid, they BOTH became the child’s legal parents. That is the law. And when one divorced the other, the law recognizes the right of BOTH parents to raise their child. Period.

As far as I am concerned, I think homosexual adoption and child rearing should be illegal. A child needs a mommy and daddy, not two of one sex. But as long as states pass laws allowing for dykes to marry and allow them to have children by artificial inseminiation or adoption, then the laws must be followed. And tragically, the law is that both the current and former dyke are the child’s legal parents. I don’t like that, but that is the law. So long as that is the law, the former dyke has no right to deprive the current dyke parent of that person’s legal child.

I completely disagree that she should run off with the child. She made her bed and she has to lie in it. No different than a man getting a woman pregnant and then not wanting to support the child. She had a child with another person and she has no right to deprive the other person of access to their child.

She blew it. She should have done what is right, shared custody, and made it clear to the child that homosexuality is wrong. Now she is going to lose her child to the current dyke permanently.

Tragic.


40 posted on 01/01/2010 6:10:47 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 48... 47... 46...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

>> The judge’s hands are completely tied by the law <<

Do you know that for a fact? Are you an expert in Vermont family law? Do the Vermont statutes allow a judge in family court to hear cases in equity instead of in law?


53 posted on 01/01/2010 7:20:57 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
You are dead wrong. This is not a child molester judge. The judges hands are completely tied by the law.

Any exposure of children to homosexual behvaior is child abuse. The judge giving custody of a child to a homosexual is a child molester.

A judge has the power to invalidate an inllegal law. Especially in this case where Virginia does not even recognize the Vermon "civil union".

According to Virginia law Lisa and the pervert were NEVER in a legal relationship.

64 posted on 01/01/2010 9:36:52 PM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
The judges hands are completely tied by the law.

Put his hands in the noose as well.


She had a child with another person and she has no right to deprive the other person of access to their child.

Where are the DNA test results showing parentage???


She made her bed and she has to lie in it.

And to hell with the rights of the kid?

The law is meaningless anymore... and lawyers, with their insular, unconstitutional bar associations are to blame for this...

77 posted on 01/02/2010 2:03:53 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson