Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Review of Significant State Tax Changes During 2009
Tax Foundation ^ | December 21, 2009 | Joseph Henchman

Posted on 12/23/2009 10:51:55 AM PST by reaganaut1

State Changes to Individual Income Taxes

Increases

California in May added 0.25% to each income tax bracket, retroactive to January 1, 2009 and expiring December 31, 2010.

Connecticut in September added a new top bracket of 6.5% on income over $500,000, retroactive to January 1, 2009.

Delaware in June added a new top rate of 6.95% on income over $60,000 retroactive to January 1, 2009.

Hawaii in May added three new brackets retroactive to January 1, 2009: 9% on income over $150,000; 10% on income over $175,000; and 11% on income over $200,000.

New Jersey in June added three new brackets retroactive to January 1, 2009 and expiring 12/31/09: 8% on income over $400,000; 10.25% on income over $500,000; and 10.75% on income over $1 million.

New York in May added two income tax brackets retroactive to January 1, 2009 and expiring December 31, 2011: 7.85% on income over $200,000 and 8.97% on income over $500,000.

North Carolina in August imposed a tax surcharge of 2% on those with incomes over $60,000 and 3% on those with incomes over $150,000, retroactive to January 1, 2009 and expiring December 31, 2010.

Oregon in July approved the addition of two new brackets retroactive to January 1, 2009 and expiring 12/31/11: 10.8% on income over $125,000 and 11% on income over $250,000. After 2011, the former bracket will become 9.9% and the top bracket will be eliminated.

Wisconsin in June added a new top bracket: 7.75% on income over $225,000.

Reductions

Louisiana in 2008 reduced rates on some incomes by adjusting the bracket structure beginning January 1, 2009. The 6% bracket that formerly kicked in at $25,000 now begins at $50,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at taxfoundation.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: incometaxes; statetaxes; taxes; taxfoundation; taxincreases
I wonder how many of the tax increases set to expire ever will. More details are at the Tax Foundation site. Other states reducing income taxes, at least for some people, were Maine, North Dakota, Ohio, and Vermont.
1 posted on 12/23/2009 10:51:56 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The Illinois legislature wanted to raise the income tax from 3% to 4.5% and they called it a 1.5% increase.

Aren’t democrats special?


2 posted on 12/23/2009 10:55:22 AM PST by Graybeard58 ("Get lost, Mitt. You're the Eddie Haskell of the Republican party." (Finny))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Bump. Busy little legislative leeches in most cases.


3 posted on 12/23/2009 10:56:56 AM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Retroactive = GOTCHA!
4 posted on 12/23/2009 10:57:03 AM PST by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyvet
Retroactive = GOTCHA!

didn't there used to be something called "ex post facto" laws?

5 posted on 12/23/2009 11:08:53 AM PST by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Though Texas does not have an income tax, for Texas businesses, we all received nice little letters from the Texas Workforce Commission (state unemployment insurance) about a tax rate “increase” - our unemployment tax rate went from .26% to .72% effective 1/1/09 - and the sad thing is, we’re on the LOW end of the rate. I’ve heard some estimates of business owners having to pay hundreds per employee because of their history with lay off’s, etc.


6 posted on 12/23/2009 11:11:27 AM PST by Grumpybutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

the Pennsylvania Constitution still forbids a graduated, progressive income tax (despite Fast Eddie’s best efforts)


7 posted on 12/23/2009 11:29:18 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
the Pennsylvania Constitution still forbids a graduated, progressive income tax (despite Fast Eddie’s best efforts)

Interesting. I wish the Constitution had a similar provision

8 posted on 12/23/2009 11:49:55 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Another tidbit from Wisconsin:

A friend in Madison told me this last week that he just got his property tax bill and his ONE YEAR increase was 11.03% over his prior amount. No changes to his house or property to instigate this increase, either.

Wisconsin has a 7.75% income tax, and their sales tax isn’t low.

My family wonders why I won’t move back there......Ha Ha.


9 posted on 12/23/2009 12:29:01 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

ping


10 posted on 12/23/2009 10:16:03 PM PST by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson