[Talisker]

Since you of the ru paul fan club are so much like the left I will type slowly so that you can understand.

And since you are of the hold-the-fort RINO faction I will also type slowly so that you can understand: Do you know of that thing on the geographical bottom of the United States? That line? It's called a border. And while you're saluting the flag and Remembering Pearl Harbor with our fighting in the Middle East, you're also supporting a political approach that allows a constant INVASION through that border. It also supports the utter destruction of the economy which - read carefully - PAYS for the military.

Paul does NOT deny the need for a strong military - that's the biggest and baldest lie made about him. What he says is that IF the economy AND the borders were protected FIRST, very little overseas military action would be necessary. That's also called saving the lives of our troops.

But we both know none of this has anything to do with the constant attacks against Paul, because above all, Paul wants to expose the Fed. And THAT is the real "reason behind the reasons" for the constant efforts against him here.

[sticker]

I agree on strong borders, but here is the thing that ru paul and those of you in the claxton brigade seem to have a problem with: This is the 21st century bad people do not have to cross our borders to attack America. Thomas Jefferson, who probably knew more about the Constitution than you paulies, fought the Tripolitan war which DID NOT involve our borders. Even in 1941, the Japanese didn't cross the Rio Grand to attack Pearl Harbor. Would strong border positions have prevented the soviets from taking over western europe during the cold war or was it the fact that American troops were in europe in force? Would strong points on the border prevent the massacre of 7 million Israelites if the arabs decide to attack them or is that not important?

As a side note, I also think paul is an idiot because of his stance on drugs, is that one of the reasons you support him?