[sthguard]

I hate to disagree with Palin, but politicized environments are the only ones in which presidents make deals. Everything is political at that level.

[ABQHispConservative]

Indeed. But when you hear ‘politicized’ what do you think? I think something dirty, corrupt and hidden. That word evokes a certain in response in all of us.

Besides, the libs and their enviro-wacko allies are going to freak out tomorrow all over again. I wonder if Al Gore has another poem he wants to recite?

[FreeReign]

I hate to disagree with Palin, but politicized environments are the only ones in which presidents make deals. Everything is political at that level.

Sarah said earlier in her op-ed that the science was politicized. I think that is what she probably meant when she referred to the environment being politicized.

Certainly no president should make deals based on politicized scientific data.

[ken21]

science should be free of politics.

[Ditto]

I hate to disagree with Palin, but politicized environments are the only ones in which presidents make deals. Everything is political at that level.

True to the point of "consensus" albeit that consensus is not always correct.

And in the case of global warming, despite all the BS floated by Gore and the ever hungry for disaster media, their is no scientifc consensus on either the case that the world has warmed beyond natural cycles, or that humans cause that warming.

This is all about a money and power grab --- nothing else.

It's all a sham.

[reasonisfaith]

“Everything is political at that level”

But also at that level, politics can still be separated from corruption. Climategate is about corruption more than anything.

Palin knows this and that’s why we need her leadership.