[Ditto]

I hate to disagree with Palin, but politicized environments are the only ones in which presidents make deals. Everything is political at that level.

True to the point of "consensus" albeit that consensus is not always correct.

And in the case of global warming, despite all the BS floated by Gore and the ever hungry for disaster media, their is no scientifc consensus on either the case that the world has warmed beyond natural cycles, or that humans cause that warming.

This is all about a money and power grab --- nothing else.

It's all a sham.

[Paul R.]

"their is no scientifc consensus on either the case that the world has warmed beyond natural cycles, or that humans cause that warming."

Even the AWG'ers own graphs show that the last interglacial period was significantly warmer than the temps of the last 10-20 years.

Humans MAY well be having an effect, but what if that effect is merely (merely?) to hold off the next major period of glaciation (which is due, by the way.)

To quote something I read a while back, taken over the last million years, or even only the last 100,000 years, "normal is Chicago under a mile of ice!"