Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom; freedumb2003

Good point, Metmom. Indeed, given the nature of the scientific method, one wonders why anyone would both to redicule past scientific beliefs as, at least in most cases, said scientific beliefs reflected the state of the art science at that time.


47 posted on 12/07/2009 8:12:41 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts; metmom

>>Good point, Metmom. Indeed, given the nature of the scientific method, one wonders why anyone would both to redicule past scientific beliefs as, at least in most cases, said scientific beliefs reflected the state of the art science at that time.<<

Well, the state of science today and in the foreseeable future does not include deities.


51 posted on 12/07/2009 8:15:08 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: metmom; freedumb2003
Correction:

Good point, Metmom. Indeed, given the nature of the scientific method, one wonders why anyone would bother to ridicule past scientific beliefs as said scientific beliefs, at least in most cases, reflected the state of the art science at that time.

52 posted on 12/07/2009 8:15:42 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson