[freedumb2003]

>>How long do you think they would last if they threw their hat in the ring of the science? I should think that neither creationists or evolutionists have anything to fear from any of the long-since discredited disciplines you mentioned above.<<

Those are analogies. Creationism meets the same number of scientific criteria as they do.

If you posit a scientific theory is wrong, you need a replacement that is 100% science and explains the extant data.

[GodGunsGuts]

That’s just it, no historical science can be 100% empirical, because we can’t go back and repeat what we are studying.

[editor-surveyor]

"If you posit a psuedo-scientific theory is wrong, you need a replacement that is 100% psuedo-science and equally fails to explain the extant flood/judgement strata we have in global abundance."

.