Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manc

Those on welfare should have drug tests....

Correction, those on welfare should lose their right to vote for two years, from the date of their benefits inception.


22 posted on 11/28/2009 5:56:25 PM PST by RangerM (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: RangerM

very true


24 posted on 11/28/2009 5:57:43 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman, end of. -end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: RangerM

No, it should be like bankruptcy they should be vote-less for seven years.


35 posted on 11/28/2009 6:08:53 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: RangerM
I think those on any type of welfare should lose their right to vote for the duration they are on welfare.

I also think those that are felons should lose the right to vote.

The Founding Fathers cared about the QUALITY of the vote, not the quantity. They wanted those with a poker in the fire to vote, which is why they developed a republic instead of a flat out majority rules democracy. The reason is they knew it wouldn't take long for the lazy to vote themsleves a bunch of "free" things.

69 posted on 11/28/2009 7:00:00 PM PST by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: RangerM

Even Hillary Clinton had to give up a raise she voted for in Sec of State salary.

Likewise, maybe those on welfare should give up right to vote for a while?


95 posted on 11/28/2009 8:06:20 PM PST by fightinJAG (Mr. President: Why did you appoint a bunch of Communists to your Administration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: RangerM

“Correction, those on welfare should lose their right to vote for two years, from the date of their benefits inception.”

- No politician, Dem or Repub, would *ever* endorse this idea.


134 posted on 11/28/2009 10:58:14 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: RangerM
I am for restricting voting rights to citizens who pay taxes. Then the 40% of wage-earners who DON"T pay might think its worth it. Also, the one's who aren't working might think it worthwhile to get a job. There will be complaints from stay-at-home moms and the like, but this would encourage even them to be involved in the creation of wealth. The only problem with this is the government declaring welfare as "earned income". Ooops, I guess they already do.

In several places just after the revolution, only property owners could vote. I think productive labor is a better indicator of good citizenship, but that's going down the right path, at least.

135 posted on 11/28/2009 11:06:48 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson