I should point out that video of the CNN report is available at the link above.
Not a creationist fan but Richard Dawkins definitely is preaching atheism, he is very unprofessional and deserves scorn.
God of Isreal is not PC... huh who would have thought that?
Well....what would you expect from the ‘Charlatan News Network’?
Warning - Language:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpCH31eO1Kk
Interestingly enough, CNN also published a pro Intelligent Design OpEd by Dr. Stephen Meyers. I was very surprised to find it on CNN of all places. Do you suppose they allowed it to appear “fair and balanced” while pushing Richard Dawkins screed?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2393961/posts
Well there’s the perfect marriage.
“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, blood-thirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”
and the guy saying this comes across as oh so sweet.
Very simple Mr. Dawkins, just show us in excruciating detail, leaving no chemical step out, the molecular step-by-step process in the development of the human eye. I want to see every protein, every mutation, every chemical process involved in the RANDOM development of this structure. Leave nothing out.
Projection on the part of Lucifer. Apparently Dawkins is so taken with autofellation that he thinks he's the first one to have thought of these accusations.
...and is he willing to compare to Allah, who inspires beheadings, female slavery, genital mutilation, acid-throwing, and impalings, even in the civilized 21st century?
Because there are a *lot* of Middle Eastern countries who *are* run by theocracies.
Maybe Dawkins should go to Islamabad or Kabul and spread the "good news" that he *knows* there is no Allah, to set the people free from their fetters.
I'll even chip in for the plane ticket.
Incidentally, what's Dawkins' take on AGW?
Cheers! Cheers!