Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre

The definition of “Vietnam vet” is debateable.

“Vietnam vet” served in Vietnam.

“Vietnam era” vet served during the war but not in the country.


7 posted on 11/20/2009 6:06:12 PM PST by jessduntno (Obama is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loathe them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: jessduntno

Not exactly true... but almost... see my other post — service in Cambodia, Laos and Thailand (entering the war zone from those locations... entering in combat against the same enemy ...


19 posted on 11/20/2009 6:25:29 PM PST by ICCtheWay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jessduntno

VietNam vet is one who served in VietNam.

VietNam (era) vet is where the distinction varies and so does the stigma.


56 posted on 11/20/2009 7:45:11 PM PST by jongaltsr (Hope to See ya in Galt's Gulch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jessduntno
The definition of “Vietnam vet” is debateable.

“Vietnam vet” served in Vietnam.

“Vietnam era” vet served during the war but not in the country.

Having spent some time in the Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club, I describe myself as a Vietnam vet. I'd add a further distinction on the "Vietnam vet" category, though - that of "Vietnam combat vet". I'd never represent myself as being a Vietnam combat vet. I reserve that term for the guys who were slogging through the muck and the mire while I was floating about and tossing in shells from offshore.

94 posted on 11/21/2009 3:50:23 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson