Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9th Circuit asked : Do courts enforce Constitution ?
WorldNetDaily ^ | November 16, 2009 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 11/17/2009 2:22:07 PM PST by RobinMasters

The stage is being set for a major ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the question of whether the United States judiciary actually can enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.

The basic question is being raised as an appeal is being assembled to a district judge's decision to dismiss at legal challenge to President Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office based on claims he doesn't even qualify for the position under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

WND previously reported when U.S. District Judge David Carter decided to dismiss the complaint that listed several dozen plaintiffs.

Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has filed a notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit in the case, and because of the unusual circumstances in that the different plaintiffs in the case are represented by two different lawyers, attorney Orly Taitz also has filed a motion for reconsideration.

Kreep, who represents plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, posed this question that is at the center of the case:

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; 9thcircus; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; judiciary; obroma; orlytaitz; owho
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2009 2:22:08 PM PST by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; traderrob6; OL Hickory; socialismisinsidious; trlambsr; Altera; ...

Ping.


2 posted on 11/17/2009 2:22:37 PM PST by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

“The stage is being set for a major ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the question of whether the United States judiciary actually can enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.”

Of course they can. They prove it every time they declare a law unconstitutional.


3 posted on 11/17/2009 2:26:35 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
As always, the Case will probably be un-reversed, without comment, as NO ONE in the Country is going to go after The Messiah, less we incur the same thing nation-wide as in the pic below:


4 posted on 11/17/2009 2:27:04 PM PST by traditional1 ("don't gots to worry 'bout no mo'gage. Don't gots to buy no gas...Obama, he gonna take care o' me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

>The stage is being set for a major ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the question of whether the United States judiciary actually can enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.<

Isn’t that what they’re supposed to do in the first place, but they don’t?

Is this an excuse for that?

I’m confused.


5 posted on 11/17/2009 2:27:19 PM PST by Califreak (Obama's Purple Reign must be stopped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

>Of course they can. They prove it every time they declare a law unconstitutional.<

My first thought.


6 posted on 11/17/2009 2:28:15 PM PST by Califreak (Obama's Purple Reign must be stopped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

The Circuit Court was set up by the Constitution! The Judiciary was set up by the Constitution.

Each Judge took an oath to defend and protect the Constitution.

So I would say “Yes, the Court has an obligation to enforce the Constitution! It is part of protecting the Constitution as the Law of the Land!”

That’s my two cents! Just an opinion!


7 posted on 11/17/2009 2:28:23 PM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

?


8 posted on 11/17/2009 2:28:45 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sen Jack S. Fogbound

This is only one reason of many why this court is called the “9th Circus”.


9 posted on 11/17/2009 2:30:49 PM PST by Califreak (Obama's Purple Reign must be stopped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

What is so bad about the pic?

Are they doing anything criminal?


10 posted on 11/17/2009 2:32:30 PM PST by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I am quite certain that there is a basis for any legitimate congress to have demanded full disclosure of Obama’s documents before he ever be came the party’s nominee. When one branch fails in its duty, does another have grounds to pick up the ball? There is Marbury v. Madison weight lurking within this Appeal.


11 posted on 11/17/2009 2:33:16 PM PST by Steamburg ( Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos; traditional1

Isn’t that the riot scene from the free money from Obama fiasco in Detroit?


12 posted on 11/17/2009 2:37:31 PM PST by Califreak (Obama's Purple Reign must be stopped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
Is that photo from motor city when they were giving out the ozero money?
13 posted on 11/17/2009 2:37:31 PM PST by goodtomato (I'm blessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
WND also has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records...

Wait a minute; Zero claims to have attended Punahou School?

IIRC, Punhahou is a private school accepting only children of native Hawaiian descent. Is Obama now claiming to be a native Hawaiian or is he just lying about having gone to Punahou?

14 posted on 11/17/2009 2:39:07 PM PST by Chuckster (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

TIED, great minds think alike!


15 posted on 11/17/2009 2:39:13 PM PST by goodtomato (I'm blessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
"What is so bad about the pic? Are they doing anything criminal?"

You're kidding, right? If that herd isn't doing anything criminal, it's only because they saw the camera pointed at 'em.

;-/

16 posted on 11/17/2009 2:40:20 PM PST by Gargantua (Palin/Rove 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Where was that taken? Was it for Obama money?


17 posted on 11/17/2009 2:40:32 PM PST by swheats (America! America! God mend thine every flaw, Confirm thy soul in self-control, Thy liberty in law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
Wham Bam, Thank you Van Damme!
18 posted on 11/17/2009 2:49:00 PM PST by ASA Vet (Iran should have ceased to exist Nov 5, 1979, but we had no president then either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

This needs to be resolved legally if we are to survive. As a “baby boomer” there was always comfort in our system of “checks and balances” as hammered home in various civic classes. Now that all seems to have been thrashed by evil politicians who know they can fool the people. They even convinced some Constitutional(?) attorneys that the issue either didn’t matter or would cause costly riots. Now it looks like some determined attorneys and Patriots will get the issue settled and restore our “checks and balances” while pulling our Country from the precipice of hell.


19 posted on 11/17/2009 2:53:43 PM PST by mcshot (Our guvmint is not made up of the best and brightest, but they are practiced criminals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chuckster

I think anyone can go to Punahou. My daughter in law’s sister is not Hawaiian but she went there. I think you are thinking of the King Kamahamaha school. (I don’t know how to spell it)


20 posted on 11/17/2009 2:55:20 PM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson