Posted on 11/17/2009 2:22:07 PM PST by RobinMasters
The stage is being set for a major ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the question of whether the United States judiciary actually can enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.
The basic question is being raised as an appeal is being assembled to a district judge's decision to dismiss at legal challenge to President Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office based on claims he doesn't even qualify for the position under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
WND previously reported when U.S. District Judge David Carter decided to dismiss the complaint that listed several dozen plaintiffs.
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has filed a notice of appeal to the 9th Circuit in the case, and because of the unusual circumstances in that the different plaintiffs in the case are represented by two different lawyers, attorney Orly Taitz also has filed a motion for reconsideration.
Kreep, who represents plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, posed this question that is at the center of the case:
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Ping.
“The stage is being set for a major ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the question of whether the United States judiciary actually can enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.”
Of course they can. They prove it every time they declare a law unconstitutional.
>The stage is being set for a major ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the question of whether the United States judiciary actually can enforce the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.<
Isn’t that what they’re supposed to do in the first place, but they don’t?
Is this an excuse for that?
I’m confused.
>Of course they can. They prove it every time they declare a law unconstitutional.<
My first thought.
The Circuit Court was set up by the Constitution! The Judiciary was set up by the Constitution.
Each Judge took an oath to defend and protect the Constitution.
So I would say “Yes, the Court has an obligation to enforce the Constitution! It is part of protecting the Constitution as the Law of the Land!”
That’s my two cents! Just an opinion!
?
This is only one reason of many why this court is called the “9th Circus”.
What is so bad about the pic?
Are they doing anything criminal?
I am quite certain that there is a basis for any legitimate congress to have demanded full disclosure of Obama’s documents before he ever be came the party’s nominee. When one branch fails in its duty, does another have grounds to pick up the ball? There is Marbury v. Madison weight lurking within this Appeal.
Isn’t that the riot scene from the free money from Obama fiasco in Detroit?
Wait a minute; Zero claims to have attended Punahou School?
IIRC, Punhahou is a private school accepting only children of native Hawaiian descent. Is Obama now claiming to be a native Hawaiian or is he just lying about having gone to Punahou?
TIED, great minds think alike!
You're kidding, right? If that herd isn't doing anything criminal, it's only because they saw the camera pointed at 'em.
;-/
Where was that taken? Was it for Obama money?
This needs to be resolved legally if we are to survive. As a “baby boomer” there was always comfort in our system of “checks and balances” as hammered home in various civic classes. Now that all seems to have been thrashed by evil politicians who know they can fool the people. They even convinced some Constitutional(?) attorneys that the issue either didn’t matter or would cause costly riots. Now it looks like some determined attorneys and Patriots will get the issue settled and restore our “checks and balances” while pulling our Country from the precipice of hell.
I think anyone can go to Punahou. My daughter in law’s sister is not Hawaiian but she went there. I think you are thinking of the King Kamahamaha school. (I don’t know how to spell it)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.