EPA Allegedly Commits Scientific Misconduct to Support Obama Climate Agenda

IsraPundit ^ | 11/16/09 | Bill Levinson

[Winged Hussar]

Alleged scientific misconduct and academic dishonesty at Barack Obama's Environmental Protection Agency

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has already put it on record in her letter to the Wall Street Journal that the real purpose of so-called greenhouse gas regulations, such as government-mandated cap and trade regulations, is to enrich Barack Obama's campaign contribution bundlers at J.P. Morgan Chase (six figures in bundled contributions) and Goldman Sachs (almost a million dollars in bundled contributions).

Bundled contributions are entirely legal but the thing nonetheless speaks for itself; Barack Obama is dancing the cap-and-trade with the fat cat climate profiteers who brought (or bought) him at the expense of the American people. This could easily be why his Environmental Protection Agency is allegedly engaging in academic dishonesty and scientific misconduct to support the cap and trade agenda. We refer specifically to the alleged suppression of research that does not support Barack Obama's "climate change" agenda, and therefore does not support the bottom lines of Goldmine Sachs (Michael Savage's terminology), J.P. Morgan Chase, and their fellow climate profiteers at General Electric (almost $500,000 in bundled contributions to elect Obama).

[Winged Hussar]

"From where we sit, it seems that the allegation "Dr. Carlin offered a report poking holes in the science underlying the theory of manmade global warming. His superior ... complained the paper did "not help the legal or policy case" for Team Obama's decision to regulate carbon, told him to "move on to other issues," and forbade him from discussing it outside the office" fits the above definitions of academic dishonesty and scientific misconduct. Furthermore, scientific misconduct is in fact cause for temporary or even permanent debarment from receiving Federal funds (if performed, for example, by a professor at a university), and this underscores just how serious this allegation is. The people of the United States have a right to know whether the Environmental Protection Agency exists to protect them from genuine pollutants, or whether it has become a front for the advancement of an agenda to enrich campaign contribution bundlers for Team Obama."

Please feel free to copy (don't link, it uses my bandwidth) and circulate the following:

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !