Posted on 11/13/2009 8:46:38 PM PST by jimluke01
It never ceases to amaze me the degree to which liberals – the self-styled proponents of “tolerance” and “diversity”… the mind-numbingly sanctimonious arbiters of “hate” – consistently prove to be the most intolerant and hateful among us. But regrettably, since the recent passage of “Question 1” – the voter initiative that threw out counterfeit “gay marriage” in Maine – the level of hate-filled bile we’ve come to expect from the left has morphed from malicious to menacing.
In the wake of the horrific act of Islamic domestic terrorism at Fort Hood Texas, it’s been learned that militant homosexual activists recently made similar online postings to those of Nidal Malik Hasan, threatening additional acts of terrorism against Christians.
A number of pro-marriage advocates have also received death threats directly.
Shortly after “Question 1” was voted into law, I issued a press release (posted with additional commentary at AmericansForTruth.com) hailing this pro-family victory. In reaction to that statement a handful of homosexual activists on the popular anti-Christian “JoeMyGod” weblog, became completely unhinged, engaging in death threats and warning of future homosexualist terrorism should their political demands not be met.
Blog poster “ColdCountry” wrote: “Will someone please give me a gun?” Poster “Fritz” warned: “What I fear is that once gay and lesbian people give up hope of achieving equality through nonviolent means, there will be radicals who will begin to hunt down haters… All it will take is a small group of radical zealots who are willing to kill for their cause.”
In reply to Fritz, “tex” posted: “Fritz....you say this like it's a bad thing? Maybe a bit of well organized terrorism is just what we need.”
[PLEASE POST ON TOWNHALL AS WELL AS FR]
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Al GAYda..!!!
I am not married, does that mean I haven't achieved equality?
A proponent of gay marriage would say, "But you DO have the right to GET married!"
To which I'd respond, "Yes, but I can't marry a lamp."
What planet are these people on where marriage means people of the same sex getting together? I have a gay friend who despises this subject. "Two men can't have kids!" he says. He is not a "Log Cabin Republican," but he is a reasonable person, and he is as baffled by this kind of behavior. He doesn't expect the rest of us to validate his lifestyle--what does he care? (I tell him he has Libertarian tendencies and just doesn't know it.)
The left-wing ‘Progressive’ movement has it’s roots in fascism and terrorism. They have never respected our form of government or the rule of law.
How is it that the science of what causes hmosexuality is settled? Or the science of gobal warming? Or the science of when life begins?
Yet the left-wing progressive demands that we all march in lockstep to their demands on these issues and their can be no more debate or else you are hateful and must be stoppd at all costs.
The left will not accept the will of the people. They will do anything to try and take away ou rights to representation on thee issues and more.
Gay terrorism has been alive and well in San Francisco for decades.
I have been in churches were they come in and scream, or have kiss-ins outside, where they terrorize folks within the church, scream spitting into kids’ faces at school board meetings, hissing and doing “Seig heil!” and more recently, acting up in Roman Catholic churches (cross dressers making havoc, taking mass) and picketing and carrying on outside Mormon places.
They are insane with rage and need to be thoroughly opposed.
“Gay marriage” is not about equal rights. It is just another attack on on a vital component of our civilization by disgruntled people belonging to a disaffected political activist group. It is therefore in the same category of “hate crime” or “hate speech” legislation which are really attempts to dismantle attack on freedom of thought or expression.
From a libertarian viewpoint, there may be merit in “Civil Union” arrangements as constituting “equal treatment under the law”. But the survival of any culture requires that the traditional concept of marriage must be kept intact, because it provides for the nurturing of children by the people who care most about them. This is why the “gay marriage activists”, who are the real haters, will never be satisfied with “Civil Unions”.
If the ØbaMao justice department has anything to do with this, these domestic terrorists and their criminal acts against society will be laughed off into obscurity or swept under the carpet, as was the blatant voter intimidation perpetrated by Black Panther terrorists at the Philadelphia polling place during last year’s election.
I did (from Texas), knowing what was at stake. But I wasn't listed on any of their "hate" lists - disappointing. I really wanted to stand up and be counted.
I'm sure there will be upcoming referenda on marriage in several states - New Hampshire is even on the radar for this possibility. You'll have ample opportunity to financially stand up against Al-Gayda in the near future. In the meantime, consider giving to NOM, (one of the largest contributors to the recent marriage campaigns), ProtectMarriage.com (the sole vanguard and now defender of the Prop 8 campaign), and Stand for Marriage Main, which expended all of their funds and incurred debt to make their last push for public awareness of the insidiousness of the homo-agenda. All good organizations.
Thanks for the info!
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
I may have to “tolerate” someone’s lifestyle no matter how disgusting and/or sick it is, but that doesn’t mean I have to accept it and doesn’t prevent me from speaking out against it. The first amendment still trumps political correctness.
As a woman,I don’t understand lesbianism. I can’t imagine how a woman could be attracted to another woman. I just love older men who are tall,handsome,broad-shouldered,and who have a deep voice. I would love to be cuddled by one;there would be no greater feeling in the world! Oh,and Bob Gunton falls right behind Powers Boothe in that department!
It's not just a lamp. It's a major prize!
I don't think the homosexuals have thought this all through. If they reosrt to violence that just gives people justification to hunt them down in self defense.
Seeing as the people the homosexuals would be engaging in violence against are also the folks who own the most guns (and know how to use them), this idea seems to be another case of the homosexuals just not understanding how things work.
The left in general just does not understand how things work.
Why would they? Their entire worldview is based on distortions of reality and on lies.
They are being used by their “ideological father” to attack his enemies.
LOL!
I said to my token gay friend, "You fags are getting crazier by the day, you think maybe there's something to the idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder?" He didn't deny it!
No matter how radical homosexual activists get, nature will not reward them ...
these homosexuals are being led by fanatical, intolerant radical homosexuals activists who are trying to silence anyone who opposes them....
What we need to do and I do this is peak up more, tell them that you do oppose homosexuals marriage and that is it unnatural in what they do.
If these people think they are fighting for civil rights then will they join the LDS church/muslim where they should have rights to marry more than one perno?
Will they heck .
They care more about an agenda, and forcing their perverted view on to others.
It amazes me some people actually fall for their crap about rights.
Also there is some homosexuals out there who wish to keep their life private, who think they should do what they like in their bedroom and never tell anyone.
Those homosexuals who are not fanatical like their activist leaders are the ones who have some brains and know that these kind of terrorist views by the activists are doing no favours for them
my wife said the same but to add what she said.
If these so called lesbians don’t; like men then why do they try to either look like men, act like men or even wear strap ons and act like men with it on.
As a man I see no reason why a man would like another man in bed,
Women are beautiful, they are everything and built for everything which a man likes.
If a man does not like a man but likes another man sexually then they seriously have some mental problems.
Nature provided the opposite sex with everything a man wants in a woman and a woman for a man.
Don’t forget that homosexuality was looked at as a mental problem until a handful of shrinks came on and said it was not.
What is the betting that those 5 shrinks were way liberal or homos themselves.
Even folks who are now ex homosexuals have said that they too did have a mental sexual problem when they were having sex with the same sex
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.