Posted on 11/10/2009 3:56:52 AM PST by steve-b
An arbitrator has rejected controversial talk show host Glenn Beck's contention that the domain name glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com infringes his trademark. World Intellectual Property Organization arbitration panelist Frederick Abbott ruled Friday that the less-than-flattering domain name was protected by fair use principles because the URL, when combined with the site's content, constitutes protected speech.
Abbott wrote that the site's creator, Isaac Eiland-Hall, "can be said to be making a political statement," which is a "legitimate non-commercial use" of Beck's name.
Eiland-Hall had argued that the site parodied Beck by using the same rhetorical techniques that Beck uses on the air. In legal papers filed on his behalf by First Amendment lawyer Marc Randazza, he referenced a YouTube clip of Beck interviewing Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), a Muslim, during which Beck asked Ellison to prove that he was "not working with our enemies."
Eiland-Hall also argued that the site doesn't infringe on Beck's trademark because there's no likelihood that Web users wrongly think he's affiliated with it. "Only an abject imbecile could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the complainant," Randazza wrote.
The domain name itself stems from a Web meme originating on Aug. 31, when a commenter on Fark.com posed the question: "Why haven't we had an official response to the rumor that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a girl in 1990?" The following day, Eiland-Hall set up the site.
The decision appears to mark a significant win for digital rights advocates because a ruling in Beck's favor could have encouraged other subjects of online parodies to take their complaints directly to the WIPO rather than U.S. courts, which are bound by the First Amendment. Some U.S. courts have ruled in other cases that parody sites don't infringe in trademark, even if they use a famous name in the URL.
Sam Bayard, assistant director of the Citizen Media Law Project, cheered the ruling for that reason. "It's good to see that this WIPO arbitrator had no interest in allowing Beck to circumvent the guarantees of the U.S. Constitution," he said in a blog post.
Although he won the case, Eiland-Hall on Friday offered to transfer the domain name to Beck. "I want to demonstrate to you that I had my lawyer fight this battle only to help preserve the First Amendment," he wrote in a public letter to Beck. "Now that it is safe, at least from you (for the time being), I have no more use for the actual scrap of digital real estate you sought."
You siding with the sleaze bag?
Huh? I thought it was quite clear that I was siding against the sleaze bag (who is, by definition, anyone who tries to undermine US sovereignty by going to the globalists).
Not unexpected from this one.
Wonder what would happen if someone tried to register a doman name like : tedkennedyletawomandrownatchappaquidick.com.
Yep; disdain for this sort of globaloney to be expected from any patriotic American.
Why the he77 did this go to an “arbitrator” instead of U.S. courts. And why didn’t Glenn Beck sue for defamation of character and/or libel ?
So you don’t just bash Sarah Palin after all.
i wonder if we replace the name with barrackobama if it will gain any traction
I am always amazed at so-called FReepers who will give up their core principles just because they happen to agree with the person who is trying to abuse them. The BushBots were the worst, but the fact that cripplecreek and Mnogamer are attacking you for defending the first amendment is really proof that they either have no idea what they are talking about or are simply Totalitarians coveniently hiding behind the mantle of conservativism. I will assume the former since ignroance has a much higher probability.
geeeze I thought that website was....
tedkennedyboffedknockedupdrankdroveandletawomandrownatchappaquidick.com
Nice little rant from one more well known clowntard.
The fact that the Beck parody is not based in any fact, is completely unfunny and slimy, is irrelevant. Taste is not for the judge to arbitrate.
Beck didn't sue for libel, he sued for infringement and had no case.
What if the shoe were on the other foot and they used Obama’s name in a lie like that? Or Pelosi’s? Or Mohammed’s?
Yeah, I know that website
it is barakhusseinobamaaliasbarrysoetorowhowasmentoredandsodomizedbycommiefrankmarshalldavisandtookalloflarrysinclairintohiseverynookandcrannybeforetryingtodestroyamerica.com
MmmK?
prisoner6
At the end of the day, it is always the same Thought-police who like to play their littel “call-out” games for those who really, truly stick to their principles.
I am forced to wonder if you are so wishy-washy in all aspects of your life?
Do you change favourite sports team dependent upon who just won the championship too? I bet you just turned from a Phillies fan into a Yankees fan didn’t you?
I can at least hope you change you underwear as often as you change your primciples.
The most amusing part is, you don’t even understand what I am talking about do you?
mohammedwasamurderingpedophile.com
onemorefaceliftandpelosiwillhaveabeard.com
barackhusseinsoetoroodingawhateverobamaisprobablyqueer.com
bobbybyrdwasaklansman.com
Whaddaya think?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.