Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Chief of Staff Concerned for Muslim Troops

Posted on 11/08/2009 11:16:36 AM PST by Loyalist

General George Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, said on Sunday that he was concerned that speculation about the religious beliefs of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, accused of killing 12 fellow soldiers and one civilian and wounding 30 0thers in a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, could “cause a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers.”

“I’ve asked our Army leaders to be on the lookout for that,” General Casey said in an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union. “It would be a shame — as great a tragedy as this was — it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: diversity; forthood; hasan; islam; islamobama; jihad; nidalmalikhasan; obambinbiden; sodomhusseinobama; suddenjihadsyndrome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
Question 1: Shouldn't Gen. Casey be concerned about Muslim troops under his command, any number of whom could be planning to follow Maj. Hasan's example?

Question 2: Why is ethnic diversity considered a strength in itself, when so much of human history suggests otherwise?

1 posted on 11/08/2009 11:16:36 AM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

If I may quote Mark Steyn for Gen Casey’s enlightenment:

“So far it is Muslims: 0; Non-Muslims: 13.”


2 posted on 11/08/2009 11:18:06 AM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

What about the plans so this “never happens again”?


3 posted on 11/08/2009 11:18:15 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
What did he have to say about the actual victims-the ones who were shot and injured or killed? Did he expend more than a sentence expressing any intentions to protect them and any possible future victims? It's not as if this is the first time a Muslim in uniform has killed or attempted to kill his "fellow" soldiers. Where is the common sense? No one has killed Muslim troops for being Muslim-but certainly Muslims have killed troops in the name of Islam. I'd be more worried about a proven threat than one which hasn't come close to occurring.
4 posted on 11/08/2009 11:21:03 AM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

EXCUSE ME!!!!!!
Has this idiot been paying attention to current events.
It was a MUSLIM that MURDERED our troops.


5 posted on 11/08/2009 11:21:36 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

F___ Muslim troops.


6 posted on 11/08/2009 11:22:23 AM PST by LIConFem (Americans seem to have forgotten the value of dissent.. A firm "F____ You" is a powerful thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
You know this might be an occasion where stereotyping or at least profiling might just root out some Islamists from the military and save innocent soldiers.

Instead, Casey's worried about potential attacks on Muslim troops that haven't occured when he should be paying attention to the threat of further Muslim attacks on non-Muslims.

7 posted on 11/08/2009 11:22:33 AM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Diversity is not our "strength", that's the left's Orwellian phrase as they use "diversity" to undermine a cohesive patriotic society. And it's a lie on two fronts, because they don't actually want diversity, they want to homogenise white Christians out of existence.
8 posted on 11/08/2009 11:23:05 AM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Exactly.


9 posted on 11/08/2009 11:23:17 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

It seems we have reached the point that the percentage of treasonous moles in military accurately reflects the percentage in the general population. The diversity Czars should be very proud.


10 posted on 11/08/2009 11:23:19 AM PST by Never on my watch (The lunatics are in the White House - meet me on the dark side of the Moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

I heard from a rather reliable source 20 years ago that they were beginning to teach PC and DIVERSITY nonsense at the military academies and making it mandatory for older officers as a follow-on course. Looks like Casey took one or more of them.

Political Correctness:
”A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical liberal minority,
and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media,
which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible
to pick up a turd by the clean end.”

(This is why I caution folks to NEVER shake hands with leftists: They spend their miserable, self-deluded lives happily producing and picking up those turds and they never wash their hands.)

By spreading this definition around, perhaps we can employ one of the more effective methods of deflating and defeating the fools who practice and promote it: RIDICULE. (Number 5 from Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”)

Unless stopped – and soon – PC will DESTROY Western Civilization — if it hasn’t already.

PASS IT ON!!

(Credit hereby given to my late cousin Karl Benton Clark for either creating this definition or bringing it to my attention


11 posted on 11/08/2009 11:23:20 AM PST by Dick Bachert (THE 2010 ELECTIONS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT IN OUR LIFETIMES! BE THERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Do you have a link?


12 posted on 11/08/2009 11:23:51 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Why is the Army Chief of Staff more worried that Muslims might get their wittle feewings hurt than about the well being of all the non-Muslims in the Army who appear to have big targets painted on their backs, thanks to the Army’s PC policies?


13 posted on 11/08/2009 11:24:45 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

> “... it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well.”
Darn, I was hoping that some good would come of this and we would dump this whole diversity crap.


14 posted on 11/08/2009 11:25:13 AM PST by BuffaloJack (All Dictators have their Henchmen; the President just calls them his Czars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

It’s actually Non- Muslims 15.

http://www.theleafchronicle.com/article/20091107/CRIME/911070323


15 posted on 11/08/2009 11:25:18 AM PST by kas2591 (Life's harder when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

“Why is ethnic diversity considered a strength in itself, when so much of human history suggests otherwise?”

Because this time, it is being tried by the ‘right people’.


16 posted on 11/08/2009 11:26:35 AM PST by Let's Roll (Stop paying ACORN to destroy America! Cut off their government funding!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

Re: “F___ Muslim troops.”

This is an insult to loyal Muslim-Americans. The terrorist would have gunned down genuine Muslims had they been present, along with everybody else. Remember that most victims of mindless militant “Islamic” violence are Muslims, spectacular one-time events like 9/11 to the contrary.

Remember that Franklin Roosevelt put Japanese-Americans in concentration camps while Japanese-Americans served loyally in uniform. You are effectively doing to Muslims, many of whom emigrated to get away from their Third World garbage holes, what FDR did to Japanese-Americans.


17 posted on 11/08/2009 11:26:50 AM PST by Winged Hussar (http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
This is what happens when diversity is skewed in one direction and when one can't discriminate against another for another's beliefs.

Discrimination against someone for their race and gender should be wrong because that's something you're born with.

Discrimination against someone for their attitudes, beliefs and even culture should be on the table all day long, everyday.

18 posted on 11/08/2009 11:27:21 AM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Ethnic diversity is a dangerous to any armed force. It was hard enough during WWII for us and the Brits to get our acts together, and we are close cousins. We are lucky that we had shut off mass immigration after WWI, so that the men of our armed forces were men of a common language and similar culture.


19 posted on 11/08/2009 11:27:59 AM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

What is “frag” for $100 Alex.


20 posted on 11/08/2009 11:28:29 AM PST by JoSixChip (Time to start organizing, that's if we are ever going to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson