Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 soldiers & 2 civilians murdered, 31 wounded at "no-guns" Ft. Hood Army base
Buckey Firearms Association ^ | 6 November, 2009 | Chad D. Baus

Posted on 11/06/2009 7:12:24 AM PST by marktwain

A murderous rampage killing was carried out today at Texas' Ft. Hood Army base by American Army Major Malik Nadal Hasan.

According to news reports, ten soldiers and two civilians were killed and thirty-one wounded in the attack. Initial reports said Hasan was also killed in an exchange of gunfire with a female officer, but it now appears he is in custody, and in stable condition. Reports also said two other suspects, who are also soldiers, were also apprehended, then later released.

From the ABC News:

[Lt. Gen. Robert W. Cone] said there were "eyewitness accounts of more than one shooter," and the others were tracked to an adjacent facility.

Cone called the attack "a terrible tragedy, stunning." He said the community was "absolutely devastated."

President Obama called the Fort Hood shootings a "horrific outburst of violence."

...Cone said the motive for the attack, which took place just after 1:30 p.m. CT, is unclear.

When news first breaks about yet another tragic mass shooting in this country, the minds of many gun owners go immediately to wondering whether it occured (like the vast majority do) in a "no-guns" zone, where the victims are rendered defenseless either by law or policy.

One would like to think that, of all the government-controlled properties in America that have been turned into "no-guns" victim zones, our Army bases would not be among them.

If you thought that, however, you thought wrong.

According to a source quoted by ABC News, "it is rare for firearms to be on the base because they are locked up." And according to a source of my own, who was once stationed on this base, concealed carry is prohibited.

Indeed, Lt. Gen. Cone is quoted as saying "as a matter of practice, we don't carry weapons here, this is our home."

What are we coming to in America when even a United States Army base is rendered a "no-guns" zone?

Again, from the story:

Cone said that a gunman entered a facility known as the Soldier Readiness Facility, where soldiers who are preparing to deploy go for last minute medical check ups and dental treatment. Sources told ABC News that the soldiers gathered there were getting ready to deploy to Iraq.

The gunman used two handguns, Cone said. He wasn't sure if the shooter reloaded the weapons during the attack.

America's military servicemen and women deserve better than to be rendered defenseless except in times of training, or when they are deployed overseas and anticipating hostile contact. And they deserve better than to be rendered defenseless here at home, by "no-guns" policies on base, or by laws such as those in Ohio that prevent the sale of a handgun to anyone under 21, even to someone who is active duty or a veteran (O.R.C. § 2923.21).

We trust our young soldiers with the full might of the U.S. military. Surely we can trust them with a handgun carried for their own protection here at home.

Chad D. Baus is the Buckeye Firearms Association Vice Chairman.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; fthood; gunfreezone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Military bases have firearms policies that are decided by the commander of each post. Most do not allow the carrying of firearms on post. Eventually we will find out what the policy was on Ft. Hood. Commanders could simply allow state law to apply if they so desired.
1 posted on 11/06/2009 7:12:25 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The facts are not all known, of course, but it appears that a female MP SGT went right at him, shot him four times, and was herself wounded.

A pistol stopped this rampage. His target might have been the packed graduation ceremony only a few doors away.


2 posted on 11/06/2009 7:14:39 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Lt. Gen. Robert W. Cone said the motive for the attack, which took place just after 1:30 p.m. CT, is unclear.

I believe the motive is quite clear. The General is simply unwilling to speak the truth in this environment.

3 posted on 11/06/2009 7:16:21 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-2013 The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

i thought military bases were considered “federal facilities” and carrying was restricted by GCA ‘68?


4 posted on 11/06/2009 7:16:45 AM PST by absolootezer0 (2x divorced, tattooed, pierced, harley hatin, meghan mccain luvin', smoker and pit bull owner..what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

He may have shouted Allahu Akbar before he started killing but authorities can’t confirm it. What a pile of shit! P.C. at it’s worst! Why in hell are nut job Muslims allowed in our armed forces?...More f’ing P.C.? That damn P.C. just got 13 servicemen killed!


5 posted on 11/06/2009 7:18:07 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Not so - federal law (as stupid as this is) prohibits the introduction of firearms onto military facilities. There are big signs up at the front gate of each facility here in San Antonio warning of the penalties for carrying onto the installation. This makes it extremely inconvenient (not to mention unsafe) for folks like me who have CHLs and always carry, as it means I have to leave my weapon at home all day if I need to go by the base for something during the day.

One must wonder, what would the result have been if 5 people in that room were CHL holders who were carrying? It’s inexcusable, IMHO, to prohibit concealed carry on military installations.

Colonel, USAFR


6 posted on 11/06/2009 7:18:52 AM PST by jagusafr (Kill the red lizard, Lord! - nod to C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

There was an intersting documentary on women serving in the Israeli military that I saw.

Their rifles were always with them. Even racks outside the showers to store them while in the shower.

They know the threat muzzies pose.


7 posted on 11/06/2009 7:20:23 AM PST by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
This would have been a hate crime if politics did not prefer muslims. It is of of courser OK to discriminate against white. What was the racial makeup of wounded and dead?
8 posted on 11/06/2009 7:21:06 AM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

I’m on and off of base a few times a week, and it means I’m unarmed for that time and both commutes.

Meanwhile, these bases are “guarded” around 99% of their perimeters by chain link fences a child can climb. And in the case of the Navy, they are usually “defended” on the water side by a beach or marsh that cub scouts could invade in rowboats.


9 posted on 11/06/2009 7:21:38 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
On all the military bases that I have been on, the base commander made the policy. I think it is clear that in federaly owned buildings on base, people who are not officialy associated with the military might not be able to carry firearms.

Certainly the base commander can authorize those who he chooses to carry weapons. Commanders routinely allow peace officers to carry weapons on posts, as well as hunters and target shooters. I am often on a post that allows anyone to have a gun in their vehicle as long as the gun is in a locked container.

10 posted on 11/06/2009 7:22:48 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; All

Those who had a moment of awareness, knew why they died.

“Another of the injured was Private Keara Bono, 21. In a desperate phone call to her husband, she said: ‘They shot me. And I’m still here in this country.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1225627/Fort-Hood-shootings-Army-major-Nidal-Malik-Hasan-kills-12-injures-31-shootout-troops-army-base.html#ixzz0W5fsGOL6


11 posted on 11/06/2009 7:22:58 AM PST by silverleaf (Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
The truth shall set you free...from your career

Remember that the 1930s Army had to speak carefully of the Japanese even as the Imperial Army was raping China,and that Patton dropped vocal(and correct) support for American tanks and armour because his superiors preferred the traditional horse calvary.Patton was then still in uniform when the U.S. needed a leader after the initial disaster in North Africa.

12 posted on 11/06/2009 7:23:57 AM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

If you have been to Israel you have seen armed guards at every school, nursery, on every school bus. Being armed is an expected part of life.


13 posted on 11/06/2009 7:24:46 AM PST by silverleaf (Ours is the only country on earth with a ventriloquist dummy for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
“Not so - federal law (as stupid as this is) prohibits the introduction of firearms onto military facilities. There are big signs up at the front gate of each facility here in San Antonio warning of the penalties for carrying onto the installation. This makes it extremely inconvenient (not to mention unsafe) for folks like me who have CHLs and always carry, as it means I have to leave my weapon at home all day if I need to go by the base for something during the day.”

Sir, I believe you are mistaken. It is not federal law, it is command policy.

14 posted on 11/06/2009 7:25:54 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The gunman used two handguns, Cone said. He wasn't sure if the shooter reloaded the weapons during the attack.

Somehow I doubt he was using 30-round mags.

15 posted on 11/06/2009 7:26:34 AM PST by Sloth (For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of the International Olympic Committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Not sure why this story mentions the “no gun” policy like it was something bizarre or something new. Have these people ever visited a stateside military base? Do they have visions of weapons being leaned against each other Tepee fashion like in old pictures of Civil War encampments, ready to grab at a moments notice?
Weapons on bases, be they a issued weapon or a personal owned weapon have always been subject to restrictions. Can't think of a time in the last 100 years where they haven't.
16 posted on 11/06/2009 7:30:07 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

I know the feeling. While I had one in FL, I didn’t bother getting a carry permit when I moved back to VA, as I work on a base here, and to/from work is about the only place I go on a regular basis.


17 posted on 11/06/2009 7:32:34 AM PST by stuartcr (If we are truly made in the image of God, why do we have faults?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Yes, 13 servicemen are dead who didn’t have to be dead, all because of the left playing politics and conducting social experiments with our military instead of leaving it alone to be what it is supposed to be. Add to that the PC of disarming the soldiers, and it’s a perfect breeding ground for America-hating Muslims to attack.


18 posted on 11/06/2009 7:36:34 AM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
He won't have to worry about going to Iraq now.....
19 posted on 11/06/2009 7:36:49 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
““Not so - federal law (as stupid as this is) prohibits the introduction of firearms onto military facilities.”

Not exactly. We were aloud to own personal weapons. Even had a base gun club where we could purchase guns at a discount price My AR-15 cost me only $488. We even had a base shooting range operated by the gun club. The restriction was that our guns had to be checked in and out of an armory when we did take it to the range, or off base.

20 posted on 11/06/2009 7:38:21 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson