Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TaraP

On the one hand, I can understand why there is a question of why this can’t be set up on the parish property instead of on the public right of way nearby.

On the other, I can’t understand how the same people who can vehemently insist that gay public sex must be protected in public places, can’t live with a simple nativity scene that is displayed for a few weeks out of the year.


6 posted on 10/29/2009 10:11:28 AM PDT by chrisser (Tweet not, lest ye a twit be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chrisser

No, the question is why the Commission has jerked back a right they had given to this family. He has as much right to the use of this property as the complainers.


10 posted on 10/29/2009 10:16:25 AM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE HOMO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: chrisser

>>On the one hand, I can understand why there is a question of why this can’t be set up on the parish property instead of on the public right of way nearby.<<

I live about 15 minutes north of this.
The parish across the east side of the street has had it’s property diminish with the expansion of Mound Road. This started as a two lane highway and was expanded to a six lane with a large median running down the middle. The median is where the Nativity set has been for 65 years.


16 posted on 10/29/2009 10:25:59 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson