Yeah, it was a threat. You take far too much joy in seeing real conservatives banned from FR.
I’ve already told you how we can get along... Just post items of real interest from credible sources, and leave out the pontification and junk science, and You’ll never hear from me again.
Otherwise what you post is 100% unmitigated bravo sierra, and I am going to continue to call you and your boo-hoo choir out on it.
Or is all that having to act too much like a real Christian for you?
I don’t issue threats that I don’t have the power to follow through on. And as for you being a conservative, that’s a laugh. You’re nothing but a LGF liberal who hates the Christian Right, a major pillar of the Reagan Coalition, with every fiber of your being. You are hellbent on destroying the Christian Right, even if it means destroying the conservative movement to do it.
And as for exposing the AIDS scandal, as mentioned above, the Rethinking AIDS movement has been favorably covered by National Review, Policy Review, Reason Magazine, American Spectator, Modern Conservative, Fox News, Concerned Women of America, and many national Conservative and Christian Right radio programs. But none of this matters to you. None of this has produced the slightest desire on your part to take a second look at the issue. That’s because you are a LGF liberal, and hate conservatism, except perhaps a few issues here and there that have nothing to do with conservative principles and everything to do with your subjective personal preferences.
We can all get along if only we do it your way?
How is that *getting along* on your part?
Compromise is a two way street. You can decide to *get along* by ignoring what you don't like or want to read.
Your solution sounds more like like the liberal solution, the other side has to capitulate to your infantile, selfish demands, otherwise you will continue to provoke and antagonize, as you have clearly stated you will continue to do in your post, because why? Simply because you disapprove of the source of the threads posted.
Who elected you king of the world?
I don't recall seeing anywhere that we need to ask your permission to think a certain way or need to meet your arbitrary criteria of what is of *real interest* or *credible*. Who put you in charge?
Or is all that having to act too much like a real Christian for you?
Something that obviously, you have no obligation to adhere to.
That's a typical cheap evo shot, trying to manipulate someone's behavior by accusing them or not being a *good* Christian just because they don't act the way you like.
It’s a hoot to see you and your ilk pretend to be “real conservatives”.
And make stuff up about freepathons and most everything else.
But do keep marginalizing yourselves and ignoring JR.
Who knows, maybe one day you’ll get your wish and hoot it up over on DC after you finally get yourself banned!
Or not.
You’re NEVER EVER going to get to decide what is or isn’t “acceptable science”, (or for that matter anything else) not only on here on FR but ANYWHERE that will ever matter.
You’re not going to hijack every thread and turn it into a poo flinging contest because several people have already indicated to GGG they enjoy the articles and many discussions continue on despite you and the other buckets of poo.
People that DO matter still make fantastic posts and have been around long enough to recognize it’s best to avoid you.
But there is that one purpose you DO serve for those that are brand new to conservatism and/or FR, and that is the concept of liberals simply having no shame or self-respect.
And hey! It’s an important purpose!
So, what about it? Are you going to reply to my comment in post 49 that is a reply to your declaration that you are going to keep stalking and harassing GGG across threads on FR?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2372878/posts?page=49#49