Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Ain’t Seen Nothing yet! [Waxman-Markey]
AIPNews.com ^ | October 23, 2009 | Gene J. Malvino

Posted on 10/24/2009 5:49:20 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

Dear Friends,

            Gene Malvino is a very unusual person.  He is a retired college professor who actually believes in the free enterprise system, and the values that made America great.  He has continued to work tirelessly to bring out the truth of those issues that are important to us as a nation. 

            The attached letter appeared in the Coeur d’Alene Press on Friday, October 23.  This is the original, unedited version. I trust you will find it instructional.

            Jim Hollingsworth

Gene J. Malvino

If the readers of this newspaper believe that the much discussed and debated Obamacare is economic suicide and a costly, rapid route to socialism, “you ain’t seen nothing yet!” If readers believe the Office of Management and Budget projections of unsustainable spending and accumulated debt increases throughout the next decade and beyond, “you ain’t seen nothing yet!”

Perhaps obscured and hidden behind the petulance and pettiness that have surrounded the health care debate, , the US Senate will, maybe next month, begin debate on the recent, narrowly-passed, 1427-page, House bill, H.R. 2454, The American Clean Energy and Security Act, also known as Waxman-Markey (or cap-and-trade).

If readers worry about what Congress could do through its health-care legislation, they should be terrified by Waxman-Markey because it would gut the economy, weaken our GDP, cost millions of Americans their jobs (and medical coverage), raise the cost of all energy, especially the cost of electricity, gasoline and diesel fuel. It would affect everyone who uses energy - including trucking and transportation, small business, farming, manufacturing, construction, mining, retailing, local, county, state and federal agencies, forest products (like newsprint), the military, energy production, liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat. It would send American jobs overseas to countries with lesser energy costs and who do not limit greenhouse gas emissions – like China and India, thus reducing our global competitiveness and lessening our energy independence.

A number of respected organizations have analyzed Waxman-Markey including the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Heritage Foundation, the Brookings Institute, the National Federation of Independent Business, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the American Farm Bureau, and the Institute for Energy Research, etc. All have concluded, to varying degrees, that Waxman-Markey will drive up the price of energy and taxes for all American consumers and cripple industry.

Americans for Tax Reform has published research data regarding the national effect of Waxman-Markey which concludes that:

Direct energy costs will go up $1500 per year for a typical family of four.

For that same typical family of four, electric bills will be $12,200 higher, gas consumption costs will rise to $7,500, and direct energy cost will rise by $22,500, in total, from 2012 to 2035.

On average, employment will be lower by 1,105,000 jobs per year. In some years, cap-and-trade will reduce employment by nearly 2.5 million jobs.

Waxman-Markey will drive up the national debt 26 per cent by 2035. This represents an additional $29,150 per person, or $116,600 for a family of four.

Workers, companies, and families in Idaho may be wondering how this cap-and-trade legislation would affect their income, their jobs, and the cost of energy. The Heritage Foundation has calculated that implementing Waxman-Markey would put a chokehold on Idaho’s economic potential by, on average, reducing gross state product (GSP) by $1.97 billion, reducing personal income by $475 million, destroying 6,534 jobs, raising electricity prices by $531.92 per household, and raising gasoline prices by $0.66 per gallon over the 2012 -2035 timeframe.

The National Association of Manufacturers (both large and small firms) forecasts a gloomier picture regarding job loss, disposable household income, impact on energy prices, higher electricity prices, lower economic growth, impact on industry, low income families and state budgets. Specifically, Idaho’s 838 schools and universities and 52 hospitals will likely experience an 18.1 % to 27.9% increase in energy expenditures. For government entities, costs for services, including public transportation and vehicle fleets such as school buses, fire and police departments, etc., will rise dramatically under Waxman-Markey.

Waxman-Markey, which will create increased costs, hardships, and severe consequences on Americans, is predicated on pseudo-science (many say, “junk science”) by the manic proponents of this legislation. Without question, this legislation will give our government unprecedented power, control and regulation over everyone’s lives 

As reported numerous times before in the media, tens of thousands of respected and eminent atmospheric scientists, climatologists, meteorologists, physicists, etc. have petitioned the government stating emphatically that “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human (anthropogenic) release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon natural and animal environments of the Earth.”

In fact, global temperatures have been cooling over the last seven decades while CO2 has risen. Increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere follow warming trends. They do not precede them. Carbon dioxide is a variable trace gas (0.035-0.38% by volume of the atmosphere) and by itself will produce little warming. Carbon dioxide affects only winter temperatures while water vapor affects summer temperatures. However, CO2 has been totally uncorrelated with temperature over the last decade and significantly negative since 2002. CO2 is not a pollutant, or a poisonous gas like carbon monoxide, but a naturally occurring gas that together with chlorophyll and sunlight is essential to photosynthesis.

So why, as meteorologist, Dr. Martin Hertzog states, is the New York Times (and other media) “Continuously regurgitating fear-mongering, and the anecdotal clap trap of global warming propagandists (i.e. Al Gore and Barack Obama).

Where is the morality, compassion, and ethics of the Congress and the Obama administration sycophants or supportive “useful idiots” (Lenin), in pushing such costly, destructive legislation like Waxman-Markey?

These questions can best be addressed by asking some questions of our congressmen, senators, and the administration. We might ask:

Why the legislation in the first place? What “empirical” evidence do we have that global warming and “greenhouse gases” are destroying the planet? What “empirical” evidence do we have that Waxman-Markey will ever counter natural climate change and fluctuation? Where is the realism in hoping that major emitters like China, India or other developing nations will ever effectively comply with emissions control schemes? Why the hurry and demand for climate change crisis management? Can we not take some time for accurate cost/benefit analysis? Why, in times of severe economic recession, do we want to pile on more energy and regulation cost and debt? Have you, Congressman or Senator or Mr. President, actually read the 1427 pages of the bill and understand its impact on your constituency? Why sock it to the poor, the unemployed and the disadvantaged who pay a disproportionate amount of their disposable income for energy?

Unfortunately we live in a country where the cynical manipulation of people’s fears and anxieties often override informed public debate. Sound science and economics and principled beliefs seem to have become negotiable commodities, and all too often the search for truth is sacrificed on the altar of “whatever works.”

Silence is no longer an option!


Gene J. Malvino, professor (retired)

Coeur d’Alene, Idaho


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhoenergy; capandtrade; globaloney; socialism; waxmanmarkey

1 posted on 10/24/2009 5:49:20 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I don’t see cap-and-trade as much of a long term problem than the health care “reform”.

Health care reform is an entitlement, and once established it is very difficult to dislodge. Can’t get rid of social security, or medicare- this will be no different.

Cap-and-trade would seem to be easier to destroy, if it is unfortunately enacted. The system is based upon power plants and other carbon polluters being forced to buy carbon credits on the market in order to stay in business. This can be defeated just by increasing the number of credits available, which makes the system pointless and a lot less of a burden in a hurry as the price for carbon credits plummets.


2 posted on 10/24/2009 6:23:50 PM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
From Sept. 7 2009 Rasmussen poll:

Forty-seven percent (47%) of U.S. voters say global warming is caused by long-term planetary trends rather than human activity.

However, the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 42% still blame human activity more for climate change, while five percent (5%) say there is some other reason.

Except for June when the two points of view were virtually tied, voters have been trending away from blaming human activity since January. . .

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/47_blame_global_warming_on_planetary_trends_not_humans

3 posted on 10/24/2009 6:29:03 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Like_Spam

I can only come to one conclusion what’s gonna light the fuse. There’s just so many unbelievable acts perpetrated on the people of America from Washington with no end in site except for the end of America as we knew her.


4 posted on 10/24/2009 6:41:42 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (Leaders who refuse to lead will be lead by the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

We have already seen the end of America as I knew her. The question now is whether there will be a United States of America of any description.

Look and observe, anyone who wants to be looked upon with favor by the current government ABSOLUTELY MUST BE A CORRUPT, LYING, THEIVING SCOUNDREL WHO IS WILLING TO DO OR SAY ANYTHING THAT WILL DESTROY AMERICA. Anyone who stands up for traditional American values and insists on seeing things in a logical sequence will be ridiculed, disparaged, hectored and hounded day and night. If the founding fathers returned tomorrow and started teaching political science and logic the entire Democratic party plus a large segment of the Republican party and many FR “conservatives” would call them madmen.


5 posted on 10/24/2009 7:09:17 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

“I can only come to one conclusion what’s gonna light the fuse.”

- If I had to take a guess, I would guess the decriminalization of child pornography, similar to the situation in countrys like Ukraine. And even then, I don’t think liberals will throw much of a fuss since they obviously didn’t with the MURDER of the unborn in a mother’s womb. Then gay marriage, gay adoption, etc. Crickets.

I am really hoping that the Almighty grants us teleportation technology so we can just beam all the liberals back up north! Course, this would also mean beaming most blacks in cities as most are Democrats, and the Dems will cry “racist!” once again.

Sad that we could even contemplate any serious discussion involving any of the above.


6 posted on 10/24/2009 7:31:49 PM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: I_Like_Spam

Both healcare and cap and tax are for the express purpose of gaining CONTROL OVER THE PEOPLE.

Dismiss it at your peril.


7 posted on 10/24/2009 7:37:54 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Michael Yon: "The U.S. military is the most respected institution in Iraq.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

btrl


8 posted on 10/24/2009 10:46:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (Democracy sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Congress keeps printing these books with HR and a number after it for the title. They are blank checks to rule America by tyrannical dictatorship.


9 posted on 10/25/2009 5:31:31 AM PDT by RoadTest ( But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson