Posted on 10/14/2009 9:13:28 AM PDT by freespirited
No, they’re not from Rasmussen. :)
“It disturbs me to learn that 43% of the Commonwealth actually support Deeds.”
As it disturbed a lot of people when 54% of the Commonwealth went for 0bama.
“Fifty-three percent (53%) now approve of Obama’s performance as president”
That’s very unfortunate. A lot of kool-aid still being drunk here, especially in Occupied (Northern) Virginia.
Dirty Deeds started running against Pat Robertson when he stopped running against Bush....
For I while there I wondered if both of them were running :)
If it’s not close, they can’t cheat.
Not exactly. If it's not close, cheating will be more likely to be futile for the 'Rats, so they'll be less motivated to do it. It's not that they can't.
I think it’s a Rushism.
Hard to believe 0 can be at 53% in VA when he has dropped in just about every other state. He took VA with about 52.5%. If his approval there is still that good then there is something wrong. And if he is still popular (as is Kaine) it must mean Deeds is one big dud as a candidate.
I question that 53% again though since another poll showed 0’s approval in NJ at only 46%! That is very weak in a state he carried by such a wide margin. If 0 really is supported by a majority of Virginians I wonder why he wants to stay away from loser Deeds, and vice versa.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.