Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Monarch Butterfly Antenna: A Hi-tech Tiny Toolkit
ICR News ^ | October 9, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 10/09/2009 8:29:19 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: loveliberty2

I just bought a house with a huge backyard, with lots of natural trees and vegetation. I can’t believe how many different kinds of birds are back there. And speaking of hummingbirds, they sure are courageous little critters. They routinely dive-bomb birds that would probably just assume eat them for lunch. Amazing to watch.


21 posted on 10/09/2009 9:52:44 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
I have 4 hummer feeders on my back deck, around where we sit. They come and go often. We have gotten to recognize different ones, and have named a couple of regulars. But, there are plenty more that we do not recognize. I have no idea how far they range.

The "dive-bombers" around here are blue Jays and Mockingbirds. I watched a Mock harassing a big Redtail Hawk with food in his claws. He would fly up and down to get away, but the Mock kept going and going and going...

(Googled for pic)

22 posted on 10/09/2009 9:58:57 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Click it or Ticket!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

Cool pick! For some reason my hummingbirds don’t feed from my hummingbird feeders; or if they do, they do so when I’m not looking. But we have lots of flowers growing on vines all over the place, so purhaps that’s why. I have also noticed that 9 times out of 10, if my wife is wearing bright colors while doing dishes in the kitchen window, they will hover just outside the window and look at her. They don’t pay any attention to me when I’m doing dishes, bright colors or no :o(

PS But the do pay attention when I’m out in the backyard with a hose. If I spray the water up in the air, they will hover about 10-20 feet above the water stream, and then dive bomb it. Very fun to watch :o)


23 posted on 10/09/2009 10:09:38 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

OH, that is so good.


24 posted on 10/09/2009 10:41:03 AM PDT by annieokie (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

25 posted on 10/09/2009 10:59:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (The Zero has more airtime than Michael Jordan...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FormerRep

My misunderstanding. I read through it quickly.


26 posted on 10/09/2009 11:46:15 AM PDT by secret garden (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: secret garden

No problem! :)


27 posted on 10/09/2009 11:48:39 AM PDT by FormerRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: secret garden
Fascinating post. Especially the last sentence. Who would imagine that Science would print this, using Genesis as a reference?

No one. Because Science did not write that, ICR did. ICR likes to blur the lines all the time though, so your mistake is purposeful.
28 posted on 10/09/2009 12:26:00 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Californian
ICR is privately funded, I believe. The reason they study stuff...

I'm fairly certain the ICR does not actually "study" anything other than local politics, group think, and what the latest indices are regarding what creationists will swallow next.

Why should the atheists have all the research?

They don't. The vast majority of research scientists in all fields do not identify as atheists. And as far as ICR is concerned, they don't do "research." They gloss over real research and repackage it with quote mining and word games, always ending each blurb with, "It's very difficult to understand, therefore God did it." That's not research, that's apologetics.
29 posted on 10/09/2009 12:29:48 PM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
‘These butterflies, therefore, have a well-organized network of data coordination involving light information captured both with eyes and antennae, as well as circadian clocks in both the brain and antennae. After considering the chemical, wind, and sound detectors within the antennae alone—as well as the geographic information that is somehow transferred to the second generation that enables them to travel to a location they’ve never visited—one can see that such specifications could never be generated randomly. For functionality, they would require an engineer to specifically design them to work in conjunction with the complex systems present in the eyes and brain to steer the butterfly to its programmed destination.

What empirical evidence does Mr. Thomas cite to support this assertion?

30 posted on 10/09/2009 2:17:40 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secret garden

Brian Thomas* also has a wrong statement in the first paragraph. He states:

“Monarch butterflies have fascinated biologists for a long time. A 3,000-mile road trip in even the most comfortable car would prove daunting to many humans, but these beautiful insects can migrate that same distance every year from Canada to a specific grove of fir trees in Mexico each fall. The next generation of monarchs can then travel back to Canada in the spring.”
Wrong.
The butterflies that are born in Mexico (east of the Rockies) or in costal California (west of the Rockies) do not fly all the way back to where they summer. There is another one or two generations in-between. The ones that fly south the next winter are the grand or great grandchildren of the ones that laid the eggs down south.

I have seen the Monarchs at Pacific Gove(between Monterey and Carmel)and saw more butterflies in that one little park than I have seen in the rest of my life.


31 posted on 10/09/2009 3:04:10 PM PDT by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Wacka

I’ve harvested the larva and fed them until they formed their chrysalis indoors, to save them from insect and bird predators and watched them emerge. We didn’t have any around here this year and the butterfly weed plants were enormous but I’ve seen several adults in the past two weeks. Their timing must’ve been off this year.


32 posted on 10/09/2009 3:35:40 PM PDT by secret garden (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

This thread has nothing to do with Barack Obama’s achievement.


33 posted on 10/09/2009 6:08:20 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Obama votes "present": wins Nobel Peace Prize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson