Holdren says Constitution backs compulsory abortion

WND ^ | 9/22/09 | Jerome Corsi

[pissant]

Obama science czar John Holdren stated in a college textbook he co-authored that in conditions of emergency, compulsory abortion would be sustainable under the U.S. Constitution, even with Supreme Court review.

WND has obtained a copy of "Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment," published in 1977 and co-authored by Holdren with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich's wife, Ann. As WND reported, the authors argued involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by "climate change."

To prevent ecological disasters, including "global warming," Holdren argued the U.S. Constitution would permit involuntary abortions, government-imposed sterilizations and laws limiting the number of children as steps justified under the banner of "sustainable well-being."

[pissant]

Wow. And this radical mental midget is a key adviser?

[SampleMan]

He’ll be catching bullets first.

[lmarie373]

same though here,
along with what is he smoking/drinking?

[muawiyah]

He thinks slaughtering the innocent is justifiable.

Naw, he's not intending to be first ~ but keep that name in mind ~ if necessary he should be first.

[pissant]

In any such emergency, it won’t be liberals forcing ANYTHING onto conservatives. I’ll guarantee you.

[norwaypinesavage]

"U.S. Constitution would permit involuntary abortions, government-imposed sterilizations and laws limiting the number of children as steps justified under the banner of "sustainable well-being."

I'm sure glad the founders put the Second Amendment ahead of the sustainable well being amendment.

[BenLurkin]

In reality it could only depend on who sits on SCOTUS

All that would be needed is five “progressive” justices.

[driftdiver]

From what I’ve seen every single advisor this faker has is just as bad, or worse.

[GladesGuru]

“Naw, he’s not intending to be first ~ but keep that name in mind ~ if necessary he should be first.”

Can’t be - he’s far from innocent. And, given that he is far from good, he’s safe from being first. WHy? ‘Cause only the good die young.

;-)

[earlJam]

WND is about two-three months behind on this story.

[Jeff Head]

YOU TOO, HOLDREN.

[A message]

What is with the left and their obsession with killing?

[Ev Reeman]

This is a patently false claim because it expressly says in our Constitution that we are endowed with unalienable rights and among these are LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Let us be very clear.

Abortion is ANTI LIFE.

[VR-21]

"What is with the left and their obsession with killing?"

It dovetails with their totalitarian impulse.

[Lorianne]

But of course, he didn’t advocate cumpulsory vasectomies now, did he?

Didn’t think so.

Sexist pig.

[Logical me]

King Obama’s crew. No surprise here.

[headsonpikes]

Why the surprise about these progressive views?

There’s absolutely nothing in the Constitution regarding the separation of Moloch and State, so just get over your hangups about infanticide.

The future’s so bright I gotta wear shades.

[XenaLee]

I want these people out. I want them OFF of the planet earth. I don’t care what it takes.

[Perchant]

Yeah, we already know this Holdren psychopath's story. The American People have already decided that they want a science czar who goes to work for the Heinz Ketchup Company Owners because he imagines secretly sterilizing people through the food supply by uniform mass distribution of the sterilant product.

[chris37]

Well, I don’t know about you guys, but I have about had it with 0bama and his assorted ghouls.