[GodGunsGuts]

Ping!

[sickoflibs]

RE :”Without the assumption of millions of years, however, the fossil data begin to make much more sense. Fresh-looking fossil features point to a young world.”

Yes, and dont forget that ‘young’ star-light that was created to ‘look’ like ‘old’ star-light, billions of years old.

[maine-iac7]

ping

[Sacajaweau]

I’m still waiting for the answer to: “What came first...the chicken or the egg?”

[DogBarkTree]

Do you believe that humans existed at the same time as dinosaurs?

[NonValueAdded]

“I’ll take immersed in oil for $1000, Alex.”

[count-your-change]

“Forget that bird stuff, we’re interested in colored dinosaur feathers, the Holy Grail of feathers”.

Oh, bah-ru-ther!

[hellbender]

If the bird feathers in the Messel oil shale are beautifully preserved because they are young, why do we not find all young feathers in that state? Intact fossils of complete bird, fish, and many other skeletons, with intact feathers or scales respectively) are extremely rare. They generally occur only in deposits which (regardless of age) were laid down in relatively deep, chemically stratified water bodies with anoxic conditions at depth. That was the case with the Messel oil shale (and other, similar deposits like the Green River oil shale):

http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/evolution/messel_pit.html

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Rocks have expiration dates?

[humblegunner]

Fresh-looking fossil features point to a young world.

Or not. To simplify:

You often refer to young-looking fossils as evidence of a young world.

What about the old-looking fossils? What do they point to?

[DoctorMichael]

When they said that "You can't trust everything you read on the internet", the Institute for Creation Research was what they had in mind.

See my ***Tagline***

[ReignOfError]

Evolutionary geologists

Heh. Geology refutes young-Earth creationism? Geologists must be Darwinists too!