Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Progressives decry resignation of Van Jones
SFGate ^ | September 7, 2009 | Joe Garofoli

Posted on 09/07/2009 2:04:01 AM PDT by South40

The middle-of-the-night resignation Sunday of longtime Bay Area activist Van Jones as a White House environmental adviser left many progressives angry at the Obama administration for buckling to conservative criticism of Jones' controversial past comments and actions.

The administration is losing not only one of the nation's leading environmentalists, progressives say, but one of the few liberal voices with President Obama's ear.

Jones resigned amid a furor over his signature on a 2004 petition questioning the government's actions around the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Supporters say the administration surely knew his background when they appointed Jones, the first African American to write a best-selling environmental book, as special adviser for green jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality. In fact, agents interviewed at least one of his former supervisors in San Francisco - Eva Paterson - when the FBI vetted his appointment.

This year, Time magazine named Jones one of the 100 most influential people in the world. Former Vice President Al Gore is a fan, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said his best-selling book, "Green Collar," showcased his "sparkling intelligence, powerful vision and deep empathy."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: communists; crybabies; liberals; libtards; obama; pityparty; racistcard; racists; stradavarius; vanjones; whaaaaaambulance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: woofie

“He was busy sparkling and didnt read it thoroughly”

Even though he spoke at a rally on 9/13/01 to blame the US for the attacks? We need to get the info out on that one but maybe Beck will clear the decks of Van Jones tomorrow while he initiates action on now a target rich environment as more people will be watching.

Think of it like the weeks afteer a Super Bowl game when all of a sudden out of nowhere scores of people can be seen sporting shirts and stickers of the victor where weeks before there were none. Glenn is on the rise and more people are taking notice with intentions good and bad.


21 posted on 09/07/2009 3:42:25 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: South40
“many progressives angry at the Obama administration”

They are angry in power. They are angry out of power.

It is 12:50 - they are angry.

22 posted on 09/07/2009 3:50:36 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (To meet decent people these days you have to create them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2001/09/13/1040351.php


23 posted on 09/07/2009 4:01:13 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
"shape of a crescent"

More like the shape of a sickle. As in hammer and sickle.

24 posted on 09/07/2009 4:28:06 AM PDT by driftless2 (for long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Exactly! They are not ‘progressives.’ They are DESTRUCTIVES! They are destroying our nation.


25 posted on 09/07/2009 4:29:16 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abclily

They are not progressive. They are Destructive Democrats.


26 posted on 09/07/2009 4:32:09 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: South40
one of the few liberal voices with President Obama's ear.

HUH? Joe Garofoli is on crack.

27 posted on 09/07/2009 4:36:35 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Hope he takes the ear with him.


28 posted on 09/07/2009 4:59:36 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: South40
Supporters say the administration surely knew his background when they appointed Jones,

So they are saying that the administration's spokespeople are LYING when they say it was not known
29 posted on 09/07/2009 5:04:31 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
With one of enemy's advance MIGs downed, pilot ejected, and all our fighters back safely, a post-mission de-brief back at the base:

Cognizant of it or not, IRONICALLY, AND THIS WILL DRIVE SENATOR OBAMA BONKERS, WE TOOK WHOLE SECTIONS OUT OF SAUL ALINSKY'S BOOK AND APPLIED IT WITH GREAT SUCCESS IN VAN JONES' CASE.

I wholeheartedly recommend we perfect these tactics and adopt them in the next cases: Mark, Cass, Valerie and the rest of the whole rotten statist, elitist crew in D.C. (and their replacements if they don't get the message the first time we, the People, are serious).

Sound familiar?:

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”

Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.

Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”

Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”

Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract (socialist organizations) or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

30 posted on 09/07/2009 5:06:58 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (The tiger has been poked in the eye. He is going to be p*ssed. Better ramp our offensive two-fold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: South40

Liberals cannot stand it when another liberal gives-in to attacks from conservatives.

For liberals it is like having a soldier run-away from his post during a battle.


31 posted on 09/07/2009 5:11:08 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Therein we can drive deeper wedges among their ranks, when these internal fissures develop. Which they are now as we speak, beween center leftists and hard core Marxist/Leninist-Maoists within the Democrat/Obama camp. The anger at Obama is starting to arise within their own ranks. This is where we can begin the act, and eventually divide and conquer. They are very weak and off balance as we speak. We cannot allow them to regroup or get back into their funk. They will try it with Senator Obama’s health speech on Wednesday, and they were going to try it with the Hitler Youth speech, but we gottem on the run....


32 posted on 09/07/2009 5:15:21 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (The tiger has been poked in the eye. He is going to be p*ssed. Better ramp our offensive two-fold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: South40

He is a Yale educated lawyer,enough said


33 posted on 09/07/2009 7:08:21 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

We are Literally in the Twilight Zone


34 posted on 09/07/2009 7:09:15 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ballplayer

Its a trip reading the progressive rant at SF Gate....geez what a bunch of nutcases....seriously they are really only pissed because Van Jones will be moving back to the Bay area soon and no one wants him in their neighborhood.

Way to go Glenn Beck...who’s up to bat next???


35 posted on 09/07/2009 8:14:06 AM PDT by JohnD9207 (REGISTERED RIGHT WING THUG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: South40

“Progressives Decry Resignation of Van Jones”

I believe these people need a new label.

“Malcontents Decry Resignation of Van Jones.”

Sounds good to me.


36 posted on 09/07/2009 8:18:15 AM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

There are no progressives. There are but utopian socialists.

If they succeed, Their bounty will be death.


37 posted on 09/07/2009 8:18:24 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . fasl el-khital)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: South40

The headline should have been: “Fellow Communists Decry Resignation of Van Jones.” Of course they did, they last a nut-job fellow radical in the corridors of power.


38 posted on 09/07/2009 8:22:46 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

And the teleprompter he rode in on.


39 posted on 09/07/2009 12:16:49 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama: "I can see Mecca from the WH portico." --- Google - Cloward-Piven Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson